Laserfiche WebLink
W/C4r)‘2 <br /> TO: SAM <br /> FROM: MI CHELE(t <br /> DATE: MAY 31, 1991 <br /> RE: INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWAL FEES <br /> In researching this subjects my opinion is that there was a <br /> typographical omission in the final resolution which was presented <br /> to Council. I have enclosed the original resolution (1492) , <br /> resolution number 3056 rescinding the fees on Resolution No. 1492 <br /> and establishing new fees and Resolution No. 3098 which made <br /> amendments to Resolution No. 3056 due to typographical errors and <br /> omissions. I have also enclosed the public hearing notice that — - <br /> considers a proposed increase in intoxicating liquor license fees. <br /> The public hearing notice differs from the adopted resolution in <br /> that a portion of the calculation for liquor fee seems to have been ' <br /> omitted. Looking back to the original resolution and the notice I <br /> believe a portion of the calculation was omitted inadvertently <br /> ON ALL DOCUMENTS. <br /> I have, therefore, calculated the license renewal amounts using all <br /> calculations. Below are the results: <br /> ROBERT'S OFF 10 <br /> * With the omission on the $391, 240. 00 <br /> public hearing notice: <br /> ** With the omission on the $ 12, 259 . 00 <br /> resolution: <br /> *** The corrected calculation $ 8 , 862 .40 <br /> with—no omissions: <br /> DONATELLE'S SUPPER CLUB <br /> * With the omission on the $194, 380. 80 <br /> public hearing notice: <br /> ** With the omission on the $ 10, 293 . 80 <br /> resolution: <br /> *** The corrected calculation $ 6, 893 . 80 <br /> with no omissions: <br />