My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1991/04/15
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
Agenda Packets - 1991/04/15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:28 PM
Creation date
7/18/2018 7:43:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
4/15/1991
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
4/15/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
04-05/1991 13:25 FROM CITY PO=c.,_LLE I t I'.J 9.7" -434 E.2 <br /> .� _ <br /> Meeting Summary <br /> Thursday, April 4, 1991 <br /> at Roseville City Hall. <br /> Participants: Gary Berger,Arden Hills Michael McGuire, Maplewood <br /> Sue Vanderheyden,St. Anthony Samantha Orduno,Mound..,View <br /> Dave Childs, New Brighton LaVanche Peterson, Lauderdale <br /> Joel Hanson, Little Canada Steve Sarkozy,Roseville <br /> Dwight Johnson,Shoreview . Mark Sather,White Bear Lake <br /> Roger Israel,Met Council Gerald Urban, Vadnais Heights <br /> Sharon Klurnpp,Met Council Roger Williams,State Planning Agency <br /> (Note:Bob Gatti,North Sl. Paul and Susan Hoyt,Falcon Heg t$were unable to attend) <br /> RE: "Cooperation" Issues <br /> The purpose of the meethtg was to explore the suburban response to the ongoing "Cooperation„ <br /> discussions. All parties felt that cooperation between communities on some issues may result in savings <br /> and improved services. Support was unanimous to explore ways to improve service and reduce costs, <br /> thereby possibly expanding the areas Lri which cooperation already exists between communities <br /> It was suggested that each City prepare: <br /> I) A catalogue of all services offered,and <br /> 2) A summary of where your City currently cooperates with other units of govet invent. <br /> This information will be useful as we begin to study areas of cooperation. This information should be <br /> available at the end of this month. <br /> Summary: <br /> Concensus was reached on a recommended process for review of potential al aj e of cooperation. <br /> Purpose (Goals) <br /> A. To explore cooperation which would be mutually beneficial to the communities es invol sed. <br /> B. To improve service aid reduce costs for the public. <br /> C. To dclop a systematic, objective,and highly credible process in which to reach concensus C`n <br /> matters of cooperation <br /> Process: <br /> Local Government Boards <br /> Ramsey County <br /> League of Local Governments <br /> Intergovernmental Cooperation <br /> perating Com :ittee <br /> • Police Public Works Parks 'Co. em <br /> Development <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.