My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2006/06/26
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Agenda Packets - 2006/06/26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:48:39 PM
Creation date
7/18/2018 4:45:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
6/26/2006
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
6/26/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
263
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
their fee would amount to $36,000 of which $9,000 is for supervision during the <br />construction. To take the project through bidding only, their fee is $27,000, <br />including fees of architectural, interior design, mechanical and electrical <br />engineering professionals. <br /> <br />Funding for this project was discussed at the June 5th work session. A <br />combination of funding sources could be utilized among the following: <br />- Special Projects Fund (current balance $2,317,405) <br />- Park Dedication Fund (current balance $1,203,023) <br />- Internal loans with general tax levy <br /> - Internal loans repaid with increased room rentals and memberships fees <br />- Capital bonds <br /> <br />It is recommended that the initial expenditure for the preparation of plans and <br />specs be borrowed from the Special Projects Fund. <br /> <br />Should this project proceed, the next City Council actions will be to approve the <br />final plans and specifications and authorize for the advertisement of bids. After <br />bids are received, this project will again be presented to the City Council for <br />approval of an award of contract. The Council may then order the project after a <br />public hearing has been held. <br /> <br />Market Feasibility – Ultimately, the preferred source of funding for the proposed <br />improvements is to repay internal loans from increased revenue generated by the <br />facility through rentals and fees. The feasibility of generating this revenue is a <br />key question. The attached projections of revenues and expenditures prepared <br />by City Finance Director Mark Beer indicate that the City would need to sell <br />approximately 400 memberships of each type (i.e., single, senior, and family) to <br />reach a break-even point. Conversely, if no memberships were sold, the City <br />would run a deficit of $190,538. With no changes, the Community Center is <br />expected to run a $47,002 deficit in 2006, based on current revenue. Both these <br />numbers already include the budgeted General Fund transfer of $142,000. <br /> <br />It is strongly recommended that the City contract for the preparation of a market <br />feasibility study prior to proceeding with the project. This will help determine the <br />level of revenue the City can expect from increased memberships and the <br />business risk associated with the project. Staff has requested proposals for a <br />market feasibility study and a cost estimate will be available on Monday. If the <br />City chooses to conduct such a study, the preparation of plans and specifications <br />could be delayed until the results are analyzed. Plans and specs may be <br />prepared concurrently with a market study in order to expedite the process. <br />However, one reason for waiting is that the City may decide to revise or modify <br />the project based on the market feasibility study results. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br />It is recommended the City Council contract for the preparation of a market <br />feasibility study prior to proceeding with plans and specifications. If this is not <br />desired, Resolution 6853 Authorizing the Contract for Architectural Services for
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.