Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council June 12, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 21 <br /> <br />Public Works Director Lee addressed the issue of the gate that was not included and stated there 1 <br />was an additional cost incurred by the City. He stated Staff is recommending approval of Change 2 <br />Orders 27 through 30 and is looking for direction. 3 <br /> 4 <br />Acting Mayor Stigney stated the automatic door openers were taken out and that SEH said it was 5 <br />decided not to include them because of cost issues. He said not including the automatic doors is 6 <br />not a cost-saving issue, it is an issue of it being accessible to those in wheelchairs. He explained 7 <br />someone made a blunder, because the doors open out instead of in and that the automatic doors 8 <br />should be re-installed at SEH’s costs. 9 <br /> 10 <br />Acting Mayor Stigney addressed the front vestibule and stated that it is a problem because it 11 <br />looks different than the rest of the City Hall. He stated that as far as the $4,000 is concerned, 12 <br />someone should have addressed the issue of the bricks matching before it was done. He stated 13 <br />that he believes the architect or whomever made the decision should make the corrections 14 <br />without charge. 15 <br /> 16 <br />Acting Mayor Stigney also said the front of the chambers look bad and asked who authorized the 17 <br />new front. He asked how it came about. He stated it is his opinion that all they needed was 18 <br />wheelchair access and now they got the entire new front. He asked that the people who made the 19 <br />mistake fix it. 20 <br /> 21 <br />Councilmember Flaherty agreed with Acting Mayor Stigney, particularly with the bricks on the 22 <br />front vestibule that do not match. He said of course the Council wanted it to match and believes 23 <br />it is something that could be taken care of, or at least considered. He asked if the City still has 24 <br />the automatic doors, and Public Works Director Lee said he does not know. He said they were 25 <br />eliminated because they were a cost saving measure and because they cost a lot to maintain. 26 <br /> 27 <br />Councilmember Gunn said she cannot believe the automatic doors are not required. Acting 28 <br />Mayor Stigney said the current doors might minimally meet the standard, but the City is taking a 29 <br />step back without the automatic doors. Public Works Director Lee responded he will look into 30 <br />what happened to the doors and get a quote. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Councilmember Flaherty said that he is bothered that the Council may have change orders that 33 <br />will eventually equal the original amount. Acting Mayor Stigney asked when it will stop, and 34 <br />stated he believes the additional costs will end at $1.6 million, which was originally proposed. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Public Works Director Lee stated that in the packet there are all outstanding Change Orders and 37 <br />that it should be a complete list. 38 <br /> 39 <br />Councilmember Flaherty asked Public Works Director Lee to look into the automatic doors, 40 <br />whether the City still has the old ones, and if they will get bids for new ones. He said he would 41 <br />not have voted for it as a “cost saving measure” 42 <br /> 43 <br />MOTION/SECOND: FLAHERTY/GUNN. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6845, A 44 <br />Resolution Approving Change Orders No. 27 through 30 for the City Hall Rehabilitation Project. 45