Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council June 26, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 22 <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: THOMAS/GUNN. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6860 1 <br />Approving Change Orders No. 27 through 34 for the City Hall Rehabilitation Project 2 <br /> 3 <br />Councilmember Flaherty brought up Change Order #27 and asked if the contractor missed that 4 <br />they had to tie the walls together. Director Lee stated they did miss some areas. Councilmember 5 <br />Flaherty said he believes it should have been in original bid. He said that #34 should have been 6 <br />foreseen as well. 7 <br /> 8 <br />Mayor Marty stated his is not happy with such change orders and asked if the engineers and 9 <br />consultants could be held responsible. Councilmember Stigney agreed with Mayor Marty. He 10 <br />asked if the handicap access will be an additional $6000. Public Works Director Lee stated the 11 <br />old ones were demoed, and the new handicap access controls would be $6000. He stated that to 12 <br />re-install the old doors would have cost more. 13 <br /> 14 <br />Mayor Marty stated he wants the handicap access controls back so that City Hall is accessible. 15 <br />Director Lee responded that the final total may be less than $6000. 16 <br /> 17 <br />Councilmember Thomas stated that the issue wasn’t to go back to get the doors, but that it was 18 <br />an unacceptable design from the beginning, that the handicapped doors should not have been 19 <br />removed. 20 <br /> 21 <br />Mayor Marty commented that the “MV” is back in the Council Chambers, but asked if the “City 22 <br />of Mounds View” will be added. Public Works Director Lee stated the “MV” is back on a 23 <br />temporary basis, and different letters have been ordered. Mayor Marty stated he does not want to 24 <br />buy new ones. City Administrator Ulrich stated it is the old logo that was used and that a new 25 <br />logo will go in the back. Mayor Marty stated he does not know why it was changed. City 26 <br />Administrator Ulrich stated it has already been ordered. 27 <br /> 28 <br />Councilmember Stigney asked if there would be a change order for the electrical box to be 29 <br />corrected, and Public Works Director Lee responded that there would be no change order and 30 <br />that the company would fix the box. Councilmember Stigney also asked about the electrical cord 31 <br />on the floor. 32 <br /> 33 <br />Councilmember Stigney stated he believes this money is wasted and does not support it. 34 <br /> 35 <br />Aye – 4 Nay – 1(Stigney) Motion carried. 36 <br /> 37 <br />H. Resolution 6866 Including Various Items in the Feasibility Report for the 38 <br />Street and Utility Improvement Program / Public Informational Meeting 39 <br />Update 40 <br /> 41 <br />Public Works Director Lee stated that on May 22, the Council authorized a feasibility report for 42 <br />street improvement program. He stated the City wanted to meet with residents to determine 43 <br />issues and concerns. He said an informational meeting was held on June 13 and about 50 people 44 <br />attended. He said one of the items had several mini-topics and a feedback form. 45