Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council July 10, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 14 <br /> <br /> 1 <br />Councilmember Flaherty commended the presentation and stated he was not sure if it was 2 <br />presented before the Planning Commission. He stated it is a tough call, but since it is such a 3 <br />large overage, he cannot support the building. He asked the applicant to try and work out another 4 <br />proposal that is more workable. 5 <br /> 6 <br />Councilmember Gunn asked if the 1,800 square feet is total storage space. She stated that the 7 <br />existing garage is 868 square feet. Director Ericson stated with the current storage square 8 <br />footage, the applicant could build about 900 additional feet without a variance. Councilmember 9 <br />Gunn asked if the building size needs to be reduced to 950 square feet. Director Ericson replied 10 <br />that it does. 11 <br /> 12 <br />Councilmember Thomas stated the only other option she sees is if the applicant can work with 13 <br />someone regarding safety, which may be the way Mr. Slabiak can present the hardship to the 14 <br />Council and Planning Commission. She stated there needs to be a more acute hardship in order 15 <br />for the variance to be approved. She asked if the applicant could come back with plans for the 16 <br />smallest safe structure. 17 <br /> 18 <br />Councilmember Stigney stated he agrees with the Planning Commission and the City must 19 <br />follow code. He stated it is not an issue to change the code at this point and he believes the City 20 <br />must follow the code and deny the appeal. 21 <br /> 22 <br />Councilmember Gunn asked if the applicant could build a two-story building. Director Ericson 23 <br />responded that there is a height limitation of 15 feet which often restricts two-story buildings. He 24 <br />explained how height is measured and that it is theoretically possible that the applicant could 25 <br />build a two-story building. 26 <br /> 27 <br />Mayor Marty stated that the use of the building does not change the code ordinance. He 28 <br />explained that the Council has significantly increased the maximum allowed storage area and he 29 <br />believes the amount may be too generous. He stated in the future, it may be readdressed, but at 30 <br />present, the Council must follow code. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Mayor Marty stated he is a stickler for precedence and this decision would set precedence and 33 <br />could result in an influx of large CUP requests. He stated the code could be discussed at a future 34 <br />work session but at the present time, the City must follow the code as written. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Mayor Marty suggested a smaller variance request may be allowed after closer scrutiny, but a 37 <br />proposal that exceeds the maximum by 37% is too large. He added that he sees no demonstrated 38 <br />hardship. 39 <br /> 40 <br />MOTION/SECOND: FLAHERTY/STIGNEY. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 41 <br />6878, Denying the Appeal of a Variance Denial for 2,468 Square Feet of Accessory Storage 42 <br />Space at 8135 Long Lake Road. 43 <br /> 44 <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 45