Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council July 10, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 15 <br /> <br /> 1 <br />F. 7:30 pm Public Hearing to Consider Resolution 6879 Pertaining to a PUD 2 <br />Amendment at 2442 County Road 10 to Add “Print Production and 3 <br />Fabrication Shop” as a Permitted Use and to Add “Attached Accessory 4 <br />Building” as a Permitted Accessory Use. 5 <br /> 6 <br />Director Ericson explained that this item is for a change in the PUD for the proposed property. 7 <br />He stated that Landcor has a prospective tenant interested in leasing the entire building and to 8 <br />accommodate the tenant, Landcor would like an accessory building. 9 <br /> 10 <br />Mayor Marty left the meeting at 9:04 p.m. 11 <br /> 12 <br />Director Ericson stated after the Planning Commission reviewed the PUD, he toured the area and 13 <br />said that there is almost an industrial feel to the location. He stated there are many printers and 14 <br />large-scale industrial plotters that would not normally be housed in an office district. He stated 15 <br />that it is a situation where the Planning Commission did not have the information regarding the 16 <br />property and proposed tenant. 17 <br /> 18 <br />Director Ericson stated that in 2003, the PUD was allowed for the construction of the building. 19 <br />He stated that when the Planning Commission reviewed the amendment for the addition of the 20 <br />accessory building, it would be allowable considering it was made out of the same building 21 <br />material. 22 <br /> 23 <br />Director Ericson stated it would take up some parking stalls, but the office building does have 24 <br />enough stalls. He stated that the Planning Commission supports the accessory building, but it is 25 <br />up to the Council to determine if a print production company is consistent with the 26 <br />comprehensive plan. 27 <br /> 28 <br />Director Ericson stated that the Council specifically determined what they would like in the 29 <br />location, a restaurant, but it did not go through. He added that the Council did grant the location 30 <br />use as an office building, but must determine if a print production company is wanted in the 31 <br />location. 32 <br /> 33 <br />Director Ericson stated Staff recommends approval. Staff has not received any feedback 34 <br />regarding the property and at this point, it is up to the Council to determine what the City’s vision 35 <br />is for the property. 36 <br /> 37 <br />Acting Mayor Stigney opened the public hearing at 9:09 p.m. 38 <br /> 39 <br />Robert Fields, LandCor Construction, gave a brief background of the location. He stated that a 40 <br />change in the PUD allowed an office building. He stated that a company made a deal that fell 41 <br />through and the owners have been seeking a tenant who would utilize the building as an office 42 <br />and have failed. He explained how the building would be used for the print production company. 43 <br />He added it is very technical equipment and that the company would like to maintain the 44 <br />professional feel of the building. 45