My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2006/08/14
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Agenda Packets - 2006/08/14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:34 PM
Creation date
7/18/2018 5:24:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
8/14/2006
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/14/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
298
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council July 10, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 18 <br /> <br />suggest some pay equity. 1 <br /> 2 <br />Mayor Marty asked about the sources of external data and why Forest Lake was removed. Mr. 3 <br />Lauymeyer stated that Forest Lake was included in error and the version handed out at the 4 <br />meeting without Forest Lake is correct. 5 <br /> 6 <br />Councilmember Thomas asked about the assumption of whether or not the pay system is 7 <br />appropriate. She stated she does not see it addressed in any of the material. Councilmember 8 <br />Flaherty stated that pay was discussed and it was not included in the report. Councilmember 9 <br />Thomas stated she would like the information. 10 <br /> 11 <br />Mr. Laumeyer noted that it was decided to defer such information to the Personnel Committee. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Councilmember Stigney asked about the title changes and the criteria on which they are based. 14 <br />Mr. Laumeyer stated that one was because one employee needs a re-classification due to duties. 15 <br />He stated that in the workforce, classifications are constantly updated. 16 <br /> 17 <br />Councilmember Stigney asked “who” is using such terms and where the new words come from. 18 <br />Mr. Laumeyer said the words come from research and surveys done with other cities. He 19 <br />suggested the titles changes would be more comparable to other positions with the same duties. 20 <br /> 21 <br />Councilmember Stigney asked about the Community Development Director and stated he did not 22 <br />see any changes. Mr. Laumeyer replied that it was a typo. 23 <br /> 24 <br />Councilmember Stigney asked for documentation supporting the recommendations. Mr. 25 <br />Laumeyer stated they would be available at the Personnel Committee meeting. 26 <br /> 27 <br />Councilmember Stigney stated he would like to make a motion indicating receipt, not 28 <br />acceptance, of the report with referral to the HR Committee. Mayor Marty stated it would come 29 <br />back to the Council for approval. 30 <br /> 31 <br />MOTION/SECOND: STIGNEY/FLAHERTY. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 32 <br />6858, Indicating Receipt of the Salary Compensation Study and Referring it to the Human 33 <br />Resource Committee. 34 <br /> 35 <br />Mayor Marty asked about Desaree Crane, and the language regarding the “Assistant To” title. He 36 <br />stated he would like to keep the classification of “Assistant To the City Clerk/City 37 <br />Administrator” title and that some of the duties should be taken on by Administrator Ulrich 38 <br />rather than by the “Assistant To.” 39 <br /> 40 <br />Mr. Laumeyer stated that the current duties of the position were more “Assistant” rather than 41 <br />“Assistant To” duties. He stated he is looking forward to discussion surrounding the issue with 42 <br />the HR Committee. 43 <br /> 44 <br />Councilmember Thomas stated she does not agree with changing the title “demoting” the duty 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.