Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council July 10, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 28 <br /> <br /> 1 <br />Mayor Marty stated one of the reasons he wanted to pull the issue is because it is an estimated 2 <br />cost of $43,000 and that he thinks the cost is high. He stated the traffic study does not require an 3 <br />RFP, but he would like to put out an RFP. He stated he would like a study that comes in at 4 <br />$20,000 or less and more money could be used for actual street repair. 5 <br /> 6 <br />Consulting Engineer Rhein responded that it was an expensive traffic study and the firm listened 7 <br />to the State and concerns of citizens to review the goals of what the study will accomplish. 8 <br /> 9 <br />Consulting Engineer Rhein stated that Staff gained an understanding of what it will take to 10 <br />determine what the City and citizens want. He stated that a lot of the cost is data collection that 11 <br />involves complex calculations and counts at an integrated level. He stated the City does not have 12 <br />the equipment to do the counts and they would have to be subcontracted. 13 <br /> 14 <br />Consulting Engineer Rhein stated the counts themselves would be about $12,000. He stated the 15 <br />City’s scope of services to do other data collection is about $31,000. He stated Public Works 16 <br />Director Lee indicated that the scope of the study would continue to grow and the department 17 <br />would be overrun with hourly work. 18 <br /> 19 <br />Consulting Engineer Rhein stated that Staff put together a detailed list of tasks and identified ten 20 <br />staff members who would be working on the report. He stated that he wanted to ensure the 21 <br />implications on state aid are considered. They put together a detailed task list with dollar 22 <br />amounts and put together the study that would meet the needs. He stated this is a cap to what the 23 <br />study will cost and that no more could be spent without Council approval. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Consulting Engineer Rhein explained how costs could be trimmed back throughout the study. 26 <br />He stated that in Section 4.5B, Council could reduce the scope of the study. 27 <br /> 28 <br />Consulting Engineer Rhein stated the Council is welcome to bid for an RFP but he believes 15% 29 <br />lower would be the “bare bones” that could answer the questions requested by the Council. He 30 <br />stated that Director Lee would like to combine this study with the feasibility study. He stated the 31 <br />scheduling on page 5 indicates an immediate start date with a draft study done in eight weeks, 32 <br />which is an aggressive schedule. He noted that the report for the street and utility project could 33 <br />be done by November 1st. 34 <br /> 35 <br />Consulting Engineer Rhein stated if there is an RFP, it will throw off the schedule drastically. 36 <br />He stated that he did not include extra costs. He stated they included the number that gives the 37 <br />City the level of detail needed to answer the questions. 38 <br /> 39 <br />Consulting Engineer Rhein stated he understands the City’s concern for the RFP but is ready to 40 <br />start the study immediately. 41 <br /> 42 <br />Mayor Marty stated he appreciated the report but questions if what was detailed in the report is 43 <br />necessary. He asked that it be returned to Staff to look into 4B, reductions in scope, and if there 44 <br />is any way it could be reduced to lower costs. He stated the traffic study is over $43,000, which 45