Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council July 24, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 12 <br /> <br />billboard is being built. Councilmember Stigney asked if Mr. Hall is requesting the variance. 1 <br /> 2 <br />Mr. Sontaire noted that the billboard he is proposing is the same size as the one at Walgreens. 3 <br /> 4 <br />Mr. Jahnke asked if approving this billboard would open the door to other billboards. Director 5 <br />Ericson stated that the ordinance the City adopted in May provides for very specific relocation 6 <br />places for billboards. He stated there is a cap and replace limitation and that the City cannot 7 <br />exceed the number of billboards currently in the City. 8 <br /> 9 <br />Director Ericson explained that approving the IUP does not open the door to any additional 10 <br />billboards and if one is approved, there cannot be any more built on County Road 10 because the 11 <br />ordinance requires significant spacing between billboards. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Councilmember Gunn stated she agrees with Councilmember Flaherty that she will approve the 14 <br />site, but not the height variance. She stated she does not want billboards on County Road 10, but 15 <br />this is within an area that was approved. She stated she would not agree with the variance 16 <br />because what she can see from the diagram presented with the Staff Report, the 35-foot billboard 17 <br />will not block Mr. Kopas’ business. She stated she does not see the need for the 45-foot 18 <br />variance. 19 <br /> 20 <br />Councilmember Thomas stated her difficulty is that the discussion turns to whether or not the 21 <br />Council wants a billboard on County Road 10. She stated that the discussion has been had and 22 <br />this site was determined as one that is acceptable for a billboard. She stated that she appreciated 23 <br />Stevenson’s comments. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Councilmember Thomas stated that the Council disagreed with the Planning Commission’s 26 <br />denial since the Council agreed that the site proposed is acceptable. She stated the Council is 27 <br />here to decide about whether or not to overturn the vote, not what personal beliefs of billboards 28 <br />are. She stated that the Planning Commission went beyond the scope of the question before 29 <br />them. 30 <br /> 31 <br />Councilmember Stigney stated he agrees with the Planning Commission’s decision and he will 32 <br />do everything he can to stop billboards on County Road 10. He stated County Road 10 should be 33 <br />the last option. He said the City should negotiate with Medtronic for billboards on their site. He 34 <br />stated the height is immaterial because he will not vote for either the IUP or variance. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Mayor Marty agreed with Councilmember Stigney that he does not want a billboard on County 37 <br />Road 10. He stated that the City is trying to make County Road 10 more of a “boulevard” rather 38 <br />than a highway or pass-through area. He stated that hopefully by the fall there would be the first 39 <br />lighted trailway between Silver Lake Road and Long Lake Road. He mentioned where other 40 <br />trailways have been installed. He mentioned money set aside from other businesses for the 41 <br />trailway and other businesses will be asked for their contributions. 42 <br /> 43 <br />Mayor Marty noted the code states that a hardship exists when all of the criteria are met, and in 44 <br />this case, not all criteria are met. 45