My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2006/08/28
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Agenda Packets - 2006/08/28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:45 PM
Creation date
7/18/2018 5:26:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
8/28/2006
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/28/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
173
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council July 24, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 17 <br /> <br /> 1 <br />Councilmember Stigney stated he agrees with Mr. Thomas and believes the restrictions are too 2 <br />loose. He stated it is not the Council’s duty to discuss the “meat” of the Charter, but to debate 3 <br />language. He stated there would be more money coming in from Medtronic in the future. He 4 <br />agreed with the ballot option and that the Charter puts a reasonable cap on the City’s ability to 5 <br />spend money. 6 <br /> 7 <br />Mayor Marty commended the Charter Commission for addressing and incorporating all of the 8 <br />Council’s concerns. 9 <br /> 10 <br />MOTION/SECOND: STIGNEY/GUNN. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6884, 11 <br />Considering an Amendment to Chapter 7 of the Mounds View City Charter as Proposed by the 12 <br />Mounds View Charter Commission and Directing Staff to Prepare Language to be Placed on the 13 <br />Ballot for a Vote of the Qualified Voters at the Next General Election Pursuant to the 14 <br />Requirements of Minnesota Statute 4110.12. 15 <br /> 16 <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 17 <br /> 18 <br />I. Resolution 6889 Awarding a Construction Contract for the Medtronic Utility 19 <br />Extension Project 20 <br /> 21 <br />Director Lee stated on July 13, the City received bids for the City Utility extension project. He 22 <br />stated the main concern is about how the sanitary sewer will be brought under Highway 10. 23 <br /> 24 <br />Director Lee explained how the bids were made with two different alternatives, the first utilizing 25 <br />an existing casing for the sanitary sewer, and Alternate two, which is for crossing Judicial Ditch 26 <br />Number One to get the sanitary sewer on the east side of the ditch where Medtronic has 27 <br />submitted approved plans to construct their sanitary sewer line 28 <br /> 29 <br />Director Lee stated the low bid was submitted by Dave Perkins Contracting, which was 30 <br />$444,509, about $100,000 lower than the Engineer’s projection. He stated that bid alternate 31 <br />number one would be an increase and it is the recommendation to go with alternate number two. 32 <br /> 33 <br />Director Lee stated it is recommended the City approve the base bid for Dave Perkins without 34 <br />alternates number one or two. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Councilmember Flaherty asked for a brief explanation about the issues. Director Lee stated there 37 <br />is a developer’s agreement with Medtronic that the City would provide the extension. He stated 38 <br />the cost would be reimbursed by the developer. 39 <br /> 40 <br />Councilmember Thomas asked if there would be any disruption to traffic and Director Lee 41 <br />responded it would not cause any disruption. 42 <br /> 43 <br />MOTION/SECOND: THOMAS/STIGNEY. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6889 44 <br />Awarding a Construction Contract for the Medtronic Utility Extension Project. 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.