Agenda Packets - 2006/08/28 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View City Council July 24, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 18 1 Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 2 3 J. First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance 778, an Ordinance Rezoning 4 the Properties Located at 2901 and 2925 County Road 10 and the Back Half 5 of 8060 Groveland Road to R-3, Medium Density Residential, in Support of 6 Integra Homes Request. 7 8 Director Ericson explained that this item has been before the Council and Planning Commission 9 several times. He reminded the City of the discussion and of the planned development for the 10 area. He stated the plan is within the Comprehensive Plan designation of mixed-use, but that the 11 Planning Commission had issues with what should be the use for this area. 12 13 Director Ericson stated that the Planning Commission recommended denial of the preliminary 14 plat. He noted that the developer considered the Planning Commission and residents’ comments 15 and brought forward a new plan that took into consideration the comments and concerns. 16 17 Director Ericson stated that this is a simple re-zoning, not a preliminary plat. He stated the 18 Planning Commission still has questions about whether this is the correct development for the 19 area and concerns with the density. 20 21 Director Ericson explained that the proposal is for 19 owner-occupied townhome units. He 22 stated the developer submitted an elevation with proposed units. He stated they would be 23 designed with decks on the back and concrete drives. He stated it is a nice development if 24 townhomes are determined to be the best use. 25 26 Director Ericson noted some of the feedback involved privacy issues, highest and best use for the 27 area, and that many adjacent residents felt that the property should be office or retail. Director 28 Ericson stated the mixed-use comprehensive plan provides for some flexibility, but that it is up to 29 the City to determine what is the best use for the property. He stated there was not a clear 30 distinction about what the best land use should be for the property. 31 32 Director Ericson stated the Planning Commission recommended that the City deny the re-zoning 33 because the townhomes did not adhere with what they believe should be in this area. He stated 34 that during the work session, two of three Councilmembers indicated that they like the 35 townhomes. He stated there are two options for action: approve or deny the re-zoning. 36 37 Director Ericson stated that the ordinance could be given a first reading and Staff could hold off 38 the second reading so the Council could go through the preliminary planning, and then approve 39 or deny the development. 40 41 Director Ericson stated Staff recommends giving first reading, but wait for the second reading to 42 allow Integra to submit a major subdivision and plan. He noted that this is not a published public 43 hearing, but there are residents who have comments and feedback. 44 45