Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council August 14, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 7 <br /> <br />Councilmember Stigney asked if the LGA should be reflected. Finance Director Beer stated it is 1 <br />included and shows up as a grant from the State. He pointed out where it is shown in the report, 2 <br />under the governmental line in 2007, which increased $38,000 from the previous year. 3 <br /> 4 <br />Councilmember Stigney commented that he is not interested in following the plan because there 5 <br />is too much spending. He stated that the levy reduction fund is already coming in to play before 6 <br />the budget is discussed. He stated he believes the City should have a clearer plan. He pointed 7 <br />out that the plan includes too much spending. 8 <br /> 9 <br />MARTY – AYE 10 <br />STIGNEY – NAY 11 <br />GUNN – AYE 12 <br />FLAHERTY – AYE 13 <br />THOMAS - AYE 14 <br /> 15 <br />Motion carried. 16 <br /> 17 <br />D. Public Hearing, Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 777, an Ordinance 18 <br />Vacating Part of a Drainage and Utility Easement Associated with Lot 5, 19 <br />Hidden Hollow (ROLL CALL VOTE) 20 <br /> 21 <br />Director Ericson explained that notifications went out to adjacent property owners. The City 22 <br />authorized the Hidden Hollow plat in 2004. He stated Lot Five is one of the last lots to be 23 <br />developed and the developer is requesting 1,683 feet be vacated from the drainage easement. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Director Ericson pointed out that several engineering firms have determined that the easement 26 <br />does extend too far beyond the 100-year high water level and no problems with vacation of the 27 <br />easement area were found. He stated the City’ s engineering firm, Bonestroo, agreed that the 28 <br />easement does extend beyond the 100-year water mark. He added that the developers are 29 <br />awaiting consideration from the Rice Creek Watershed before approval of the vacat ion will be 30 <br />granted. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Director Ericson stated that the City did receive notice from some neighbors regarding their 33 <br />concern about the vacation of the easement. He stated the concern is that it is not mutually 34 <br />beneficial to allow the area to be built on because there is already water in some backyards. He 35 <br />stated the neighbors are worried about backyard setbacks and curb appeal if the vacation is 36 <br />approved. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Director Ericson stated that the easement was granted for storm water management for the 39 <br />entire area. He stated the City did not intend to take too much easement and the Council needs 40 <br />to determine if it is in the City’s interest to vacate the property. He added Staff recommends 41 <br />approving the vacation pending the Rice Creek Watershed’s approval. 42 <br /> 43 <br />Mayor Marty opened the public hearing at 8:07 p.m. 44 <br /> 45 <br />Hearing no comment, Mayor Marty closed the public hearing at 8:08 p.m. 46