My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1991/01/22
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
Agenda Packets - 1991/01/22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:00 PM
Creation date
7/24/2018 6:23:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
1/22/1991
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
1/22/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
0 TO: Mayor & Council <br /> FROM: Don Brager, Finance Director - Treasurer .AiL <br /> DATE: January 17, 1991 <br /> SUBJECT: Issuance of Water Revenue Bonds <br /> Our auditing firm, Voto,Tautges,Redpath & Co. ,LTD, conducted a <br /> utility rate study in December 1989 to determine rates necessary <br /> to finance various water system improvements. The study concluded <br /> that the City should issue Water Revenue Bonds to finance the <br /> improvements and recommended the Water rates required to pay <br /> annual debt service on the bonds. The recommendations contained <br /> in the study were accepted by Council and the 1990 and 1991 Water <br /> Utility budgets which were adopted reflect the recommended rates <br /> and projected debt service payments. <br /> City Public Works Director/Engineer Minetor has worked with the <br /> consulting engineering firm of Short Elliott Hendrickson to <br /> develop specifications and cost estimates for the new water <br /> treatment plant which is the major project of the water system <br /> improvements proposed. The estimated costs of the treatment plant <br /> have changed since the original study was performed. Mr. Minetor <br /> 40 will comment upon that in a separate memorandum. Since estimated <br /> costs of the project had changed I requested the Voto firm run <br /> new projections of Water Fund financial statements to determine <br /> the amount of water system improvements the City could do at the <br /> Water rates the Council had previously approved. <br /> Attached please find the updated financial projections based upon <br /> different levels of bonding and based upon water rates through <br /> 1994 which Council had previously approved. The first page lists <br /> two levels of bonding which are labeled "Scenario A" and <br /> "Scenario B" . Estimated bonding requirements of Scenario A are <br /> $2 , 200, 000 and,delete redevelopment of well #4, $50, 000; and the <br /> Scenario A projects plus redevelopment of well #4 and the <br /> transmission line. Bonding requirements for Scenario B are <br /> $2, 390, 000. Water utility rates through 1994, previously approved <br /> by Council, are listed on page two of the update. <br /> Projected financial statements for Scenario A are contained in <br /> Exhibits 1, 2 , 3 . The Projected Statement of Revenue, Expenses and <br /> Changes in Retained Earnings shows a net loss for the years <br /> 1991 - 1994 of between $20, 030 and $125, 023 . Those statements <br /> were prepared under generally accepted accounting principles <br /> which require the taking of depreciation on all assets. The <br /> City's policy for many years has been not to take depreciation on <br /> 0 assets that were paid for by residents who had been assessed for <br /> water mains. Exhibit 3 is a Statement of Cash Flows. That <br /> Statement indicates that, although in 1992 and 1993 there will be <br /> a negative cash flow of $36, 541 and $26,709, over the five year <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.