My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1990/09/04
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
Agenda Packets - 1990/09/04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:49 PM
Creation date
7/24/2018 8:29:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
9/4/1990
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/4/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
POSITION DESCRIPTION/PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL • <br /> Position Title: Clerk Administrator Date: August, 1990 <br /> Department: Administration <br /> Accountable To: City Council <br /> Primary Objective of Position: <br /> Assists the Council, as their chief administrative aid, in the <br /> development of public policy. Develops and implements programs, work <br /> plan and budget which advances the Council's policies with the <br /> involvement and assistance of City department heads and staff. Plans, <br /> directs and evaluates, under Council direction, the delivery of <br /> municipal services. Perpetuates the collaborative personnel <br /> management system with all city employees. <br /> Position Dimensions: Employees: 38 full-time <br /> Budget: $4.8 million ($2.7 General Fund) <br /> Population: 13 ,025 residents <br /> City Assets: $8.1 million <br /> 411 <br /> Performance Appraisal Rating Information: A performance appraisal is <br /> a vital part of the ongoing communication process between the Clerk- <br /> Administrator and the members of the City Council. The appraisal is <br /> designed to serve as a guide for the documentation and discussion of <br /> performance. Performance rating categories are: <br /> Unsatisfactory: Performance is clearly below minimum <br /> acceptable level. A specific action plan <br /> must be developed and immediate performance <br /> improvement must be made. <br /> Satisfactory: All performance requirements are met. <br /> Consistently performs job to expectations. <br /> Realistic objectives obtained. <br /> Outstanding: Extraordinary and exceptional accomplishment. <br /> Results are far in excess of expectations. <br /> Demanding objectives achieved. <br /> APPRAISAL PERIOD: FROM TO <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.