Laserfiche WebLink
White Oak Homeowners Assoc 111 <br /> Page Two <br /> The Planning Commission meeting on April 18, 1990 was canceled for <br /> lack of agenda items. I called all Planning Commission members on <br /> Monday and left recorded messages and or regular telephone <br /> messages . Apparently one did not receive the message. <br /> Mr. Foster was not contacted because he was not scheduled for the <br /> meeting. It was explained to Mr. Foster that the Hearings are at <br /> the City- Council level not the Planning Commission. I apologize and <br /> it was my mistake to briefly assume that Mr. Foster would have <br /> received that information at the City Council meeting on April 16, <br /> 1990, the Monday 2 days prior to the Planning Commission meeting. <br /> If there was anyone present from the Homeowners Association I was <br /> not aware of it because no one spoke to this issue at the Agenda <br /> Session. I was not available for the Public Hearing on April 23, <br /> to know if any one was present to comment on it then. <br /> Paragraph Four: <br /> The City Council has set the fee at $150.00 with $50.00 of it not <br /> being refunded. There have been requests for decks(Sabri Ayaz, Bona <br /> Road) , a chain link fence (Michael Read, Lois Drive) and other <br /> minor single family projects that were required to pay the fee and <br /> proceed through the same process. While Mr. Foster suggests that • <br /> this is the first of its kind, he is right with respect to the type <br /> of request but not with the degree of importance or insignificant <br /> impact on the wetland. <br /> The White Oak Homeowners Association took it upon themselves to be <br /> respectable, law abiding residents to come forward and apply for <br /> this permit knowing that the Wetland Ordinance is an issue <br /> currently before the City. Mr Foster has basically asked for a <br /> full refund because he attended one meeting that was canceled and <br /> because of this the fee is not justified. Based on this and the <br /> fact that other residents faced the same situation, unfortunately <br /> - .. - - - - a ". _ . . . - - - . - • <br /> .- . - ' • <br /> - - <br /> recommendation that this request not be treated any differently <br /> than the other requests and the total deposit not be refunded. I <br /> suggest that the refund will be as explained to Mr. Foster when the <br /> application was submitted. <br /> If you have any questions or would like to discuss this further <br /> please let me know. <br /> 111 <br />