Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> LOBBYING <br /> Legislative policy adoption and lobbying have become the major focus for the • <br /> Association, growing steadily over the years. When the Association was formed <br /> in 1974, it had two standing policy committees and 35 legislative policies. <br /> Today the Association has five standing committees, and the membership has <br /> adopted over 100 legislative policies for the current biennium. In addition, <br /> several ad hoc study committees for specialized topics (i .e. land use legisla- <br /> tion, metropolitan significance rules, group homes) have been formed in the past <br /> few years. <br /> Intrusion by the legislature into local affairs has increased dramatically in <br /> recent years. At the same time, other municipal lobbying groups, most notably <br /> the Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities, have aggressively promoted tax poli- <br /> cies that are detrimental to the collective interests of the metropolitan area. <br /> Consequently, the AMM lobbyists have been challenged to accomplish more and more <br /> at the legislature, without any significant increase in resources. <br /> Legislators with whom the Task Force met described our lobbying staff as com- <br /> petent and well respected. At the same time, the legislators admitted that the <br /> aggressive, and sometimes even abrasive tactics used by other municipal lobbying <br /> groups have probably led to more success in accomplishing their agendas. In <br /> response to these concerns, the AMM for the first time hired contract lobbyists <br /> during the 1990 session. <br /> Legislators expressed their frustration with the increasing regionalism of city <br /> lobbying groups, and urged us to show a concern for the entire State at the same <br /> time we more actively pursue the interests of the metropolitan cities. It was <br /> also suggested that having a better data base for lobbying would be helpful in <br /> pressing the AMM position. <br /> RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> 1. The AMM should seek to be seen as the organization with the authority and <br /> credibility to speak on behalf of all cities in the seven-county metropoli- <br /> tan area. <br /> 2. The AMM has become "spread too thin" in the number of policy issues it is <br /> lobbying, and needs to limit active involvement to three types of issues: <br /> a) Issues of concern only to metropolitan cities - i .e. interaction <br /> with Metropolitan Council and operating agencies, Chapter 509 <br /> Watershed Management Organizations, etc. <br /> b) Statewide legislation with unique impacts in the metropolitan <br /> area - i .e. land use, solid waste, tax increment financing, etc. <br /> c) Statewide issues where the interests of the metropolitan area <br /> may be different than, and at times even contrary to, those in the <br /> remainder of the State - i.e. local government aid formulas • <br /> Specific suggestions for limiting our most active legislative agenda items <br /> to these topics are included in the section on committees and the policy <br /> adoption process. <br /> - 5 - <br />