Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission October 7, 1987 <br /> Regular Meeting Page Four <br /> Chairman Mountin noted that Kunz Oil was held up <br /> originally, before the conditional use permit was <br /> granted, due to the building moratorium, but she <br /> stated she feels strongly that they need to look <br /> at the landscaping and buffering again, as they <br /> have required other similar developments in the past <br /> year to provide more. <br /> Commissioner Burgers asked if it was possible to extend <br /> the conditional use permit with the added stipulation <br /> on the landscaping, through the development review <br /> process. <br /> Commissioner Saunders stated he would like an opportunity <br /> to review the drawings, as he was not on the Planning <br /> Commission when this was first approved, and he has <br /> never seen it. <br /> Commissioner Peters noted this would be a good time to <br /> promote the new look for Mounds View, with this <br /> development fronting on Highway 10. <br /> Chairman Mountin asked Planner Herman to check with <br /> the City Attorney to see if the Planning. Commission <br /> would have an opportunity for another development <br /> review, with the extension of the conditional use <br /> permit. <br /> Planner Herman reported Mr. Kunz had just submitted <br /> plans this past week at City Hall, and she will check <br /> with the Attorney on the possibility of another <br /> development review. <br /> Motion/Second: Burgers/Saunders to table action on <br /> this item until input is received from the City <br /> Attorney. <br /> 6 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br /> Planner Herman presented the Commission with proposed 11 . Staff Report <br /> Ordinance No. 430 , dealing with specific changes to <br /> City code covering what is allowed or not allowed in <br /> side yards, and she asked for Planning Commission <br /> input on the proposed changes and language. <br /> There was discussion among the Commissioners and <br /> Planner Herman regarding the intent of the change <br /> and the best way to accomplish it. It was the <br /> concensus of the Planning Commission that they need <br /> a list of permitted accessory uses for side yards <br /> "'and rear yards, and a list of non-permitted uses <br /> for front yards and side yards, before they could <br /> make any suggestions. They stated they were not <br /> happy with the proposed ordinance at this time and <br /> were not ready to make any recommendation. <br />