My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-10-1989
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
05-10-1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2018 8:20:34 AM
Creation date
7/26/2018 8:20:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Minutes
Date
5/10/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 250-89 <br /> (. CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW <br /> COUNTY OF RAMSEY <br /> STATE OF MINNESOTA <br /> RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PLANNED UNIT <br /> DEVELOPMENT AND TWO CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR EVEREST <br /> DEVELOPMENT' S TACO BELL AND KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN <br /> RESTAURANTS, PLANNING CASE NOS. 264-89 AND 265-89 <br /> WHEREAS, Everest Development has requested approval of a <br /> Planned Unit Development and two conditional use permits to allow <br /> Taco Bell and Kentucky Fried Chicken Restaurants at the property <br /> located at the southeast corner. of Highway 10 and Quincy Street, <br /> legally known as Lot 1, Block 5, Mounds View Business Park; and <br /> WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the <br /> applicant ' s request for a planned unit development and <br /> conditional use permits and determines that it is in conformance <br /> with Chapters 40, 48, 49 and 49A of the City Code; and <br /> WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined a finding <br /> of fact that the proposed planned unit development/conditional <br /> use permit meets the following criteria: <br /> 411 a. The use will not create an excessive burden on <br /> existing parks, schools, streets and other public <br /> facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed <br /> to serve the area. <br /> b. The use will be sufficiently compatible or separated <br /> by distance or screening from adjacent residentially <br /> zoned or used land so that existing homes will not be <br /> depreciated in value and there will be no deterrance <br /> to development of vacant land. <br /> c. The structure and site shall have an appearance that <br /> will not have an adverse effect upon adjacent <br /> residential properties. <br /> d. The use, in the opinion of the City Council , is <br /> reasonably related to the overall needs of the City <br /> and to the existing land use. <br /> e. The use is consistant with the purposes of the Zoning <br /> Code and the purposes of the zoning district in which <br /> the applicant intends to locate the proposed use. <br /> f. The use is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan <br /> of the City. <br /> 410 g. The use will not cause traffic hazards or. congestion. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.