09-06-1989 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View Planning Commission September 6, 1989 Regular Meeting Page Three • Motion/Second: Jones/Dian to approve Resolution No. 262-89, recommending approval of the conditional use permit and development site plans for the Ramsey County library located at 2575 Mounds View Drive, Planning Case No. 277-89. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried It was noted there was no one present to represent 7. Consideration the applicant. of Resolution No. 263-89 Ms. Hren noted the Planning Commission had discussed Regarding Code this at their last agenda session and directed Staff Appeal Request to prepare a resolution denying the request. She by Mid-American reported a copy of the proposed resolution had been Auto, 2975 sent to the applicant. Highway 10, Planning Case It was noted the applicant presently has a temporary No. 275-89 sign on the property. A property owner is entitled to three 21 day permits per year. Motion/Second: Jones/Zollner to adopt Resolution No. 263-89, recommending denial of the requested modification to the moritorium district to allow the addition of a free-standing sign at Mid-American Auto • located at 2975 Highway 10, Planning Case No. 275-89. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Karl Kaupp, of Super America, explained they had 8. Consideration bought the 7-11 store in Mounds View and are re- of Request of questing a wetland alteration permit to change the Super America sign for the store, which is located in the wetland for Wetlands buffer zone. He presented photos of what the new Alteration sign will look like. He reported the hours of Permit operation should not change. Anything that is needed to be done at the store, such as resurfacing of the parking lot or repairs, will be done, as well as landscaping. Chair Mountin questioned whether a wetland alteration permit would be required for the other work as well. Mr. Kaupp replied he had been told by the Mayor that the intent of the ordinance was not for cosmetic changes, which is what these would be. Chair Mountin recommended tying in all the work so this cycle of approval does not have to be repeated. • She explained it would be at least another three months before the ordinance is revised.