Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission November 1, 1989 <br /> Regular Meeting Page Two <br /> Ms. Hren advised the item would be placed on the agenda <br /> for the City Council 's November 20 agenda session, <br /> with action scheduled for November 27. <br /> Ms. Hren reviewed the request of the applicant for 6. Consideration <br /> a minor subdivision, noting the property meets the of Rslt. No. <br /> minimum lot area and width requirements. Staff has 270-89, Minor <br /> prepared a resolution as directed by the Planning Subdivision <br /> Commission. Ms. Hren noted the required survey has Request of <br /> not yet been received by the City. Willard Doty, <br /> 3049 Bronson <br /> Bill Doty, 3049 Bronson Drive, the applicant, stated Drive, Planning <br /> he had spoken to the engineer today, and they hope Case No. 280-89 <br /> to have the survey done by no later than early next <br /> week. <br /> Commissioner Dian expressed concern in approving <br /> the request without the survey available. It was <br /> agreed to take action on this item at the Planning <br /> Commission' s November 15 agenda session, after the <br /> survey has been received. <br /> Motion/Second: Jones/Dian to table this item and <br /> address again at the November 15 agenda session, <br /> when the survey is received. <br /> 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br /> Ms. Hren reported Everest Development had presented 7. Consideration <br /> a proposal at the last meeting to use an existing of Staff Memo <br /> exit onto Highway 10, which was originally going to Regarding <br /> be closed off. The Planning Commission at that time Mounds View <br /> requested further information and directed that no Business Park <br /> resolution be prepared yet. South PUD <br /> Amendment, <br /> Tim Nelson, of Everest Development, pointed out the Planning Case <br /> location of the driveway in question on an overhead No. 259-89 <br /> map and he clarified how the existing driveway would <br /> be changed. The driveway would not include cross <br /> traffic with Perkins. <br /> Mr. Nelson explained MnDOT is not excited about the <br /> proposal, but it is expected they will approve it, <br /> and they may request some changes to the plan. Mr. <br /> Nelson asked that the Planning Commission approve <br /> the driveway, contingent upon MnDOT approval . <br /> Mr. Nelson reported the Perkins driveway had already <br /> been closed off, after giving them notice. He also <br /> . reviewed the changes made to the landscaping plan <br /> to accomodate the driveway. <br />