05-02-1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View Planning Commission May 2, 1990 Special Meeting Page Two The applicant further noted they do not plan on 411building for one year, at which time he was reminded of the one year limitation for the building period, and that an extension must be requested before the time expires. Motion/Second: Miller/Jones to adopt Resolution No. 284-90, recommending approval of the planned unit development amendment and site design plans for a proposed building expansion for Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. , 2200 Woodale Drive, Planning Case No. 292-90, and waive the reading of the resolution. Motion Carried 6 ayes 0 nays The applicant was advised this item would be discussed by the Council at their May 21 agenda session, and May 29 regular meeting. 6. Consideration of Resolution Ms. Hren reviewed the request of the applicant for No. 287-90 a variance from the setback requirement to allow the Regarding construction of a temporary building on the site. Variance The building would be used solely for the clean up Request by of the contamination of the gasoline, and once the Fina, 2280 clean up work has been completed the building would County Road I, be removed. Planning Case No. 295-90 411Joel Strapella of Dahl & Associates explained the spill is of unknown volume and duration, and the PCA has requested emergency correction actions be taken. The system to be used has been approved by the PCA and installation would be immediate. They anticipate 18-24 months to completely pump all the gasoline out of the ground, and he reviewed the process that is used for recovery. Mr. Strapella explained the enclosure requested is to house the equipment used to decontaminate the water and a storage tank. He also reviewed the history of the underground tanks, reporting they were installed in 1983, and the other tanks there have been tested and determined to be okay. Chair Mountin inquired whether the City can require the remaining tanks to be relined, as a safety precaution, and she asked Staff to check with the City Attorney to see if the City could impose preventive actions on the three remaining tanks . Mr. Strapella explained tightness testing is required at least once every five year for leak detection. The life of this type of tank is usually 030 years, and it is possible the tank that experienced the leak was a reconditioned tank. He assumes the other three tanks were installed new.