My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-10-1996
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
07-10-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2018 11:08:05 AM
Creation date
7/26/2018 11:08:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Minutes
Date
7/10/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission July 10, 1996 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 6 <br /> March 18, 1993, and in order for the Planning <br /> Commission to consider this request, a <br /> variance extension must be granted, then a <br /> development review process would begin. <br /> Acting Director Pruitt informed the Commission <br /> that Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, the City's <br /> Engineering Consultant, has reviewed the site <br /> plan and found the expansion should have no <br /> negative impacts on the drainage system. She <br /> also noted that, based on the discussion at the <br /> June 19th meeting, parking appears to be <br /> adequate for the site. <br /> Acting Director Pruitt noted that a revised <br /> resolution had been distributed to the Planning <br /> Commission. The contingency contained in <br /> Resolution No. 458-96 was noted stating that <br /> the variance shall become void if the work is <br /> not finished within one year of issuance. <br /> The Planning Commission inquired whether or <br /> not this proposed variance request is similar to <br /> the previously approved variance and Acting <br /> Director Pruitt replied that she had been in <br /> contact with Paul Harrington, former <br /> Community Development Director, who stated <br /> that this request is very similar to their previous <br /> request. She also noted that the addition <br /> would be used for storage of items and <br /> equipment.currently stored outside and that the <br /> addition would line up with the existing building. <br /> The Planning Commission then questioned <br /> whether or not it should be a new variance, not <br /> an extension of the previously approved <br /> variance since the variance expired in 1993. <br /> Motion/Second: Brasaemle/Johnston to <br /> approve Resolution No. 458-96 as amended <br /> approving the variance request of Herbst and <br /> Sons Construction Co., Inc., 2299 County Road <br /> • H. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.