Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission November 6, 1996 <br /> 41111 Regular Meeting Page 13 <br /> too good to pass up they may go with the <br /> monument sign. Commissioner Brasaemle <br /> explained that possibly a monument sign, <br /> especially for the Bridgeman's site, may be <br /> more suitable and easier to see in this case <br /> because of the proposed bridge. He explained <br /> that we should address all the signs, not just <br /> the one sign, because if we deal with each of <br /> the other signs individually we could end up <br /> with something we don't really want. <br /> Commissioner Obert expressed his concern <br /> that if we approved some type of sign package, <br /> later on down the road it may not fit with the <br /> entire picture of what we are looking at for the <br /> proposed Highway 10 corridor. <br /> Director Sheldon informed the Commission that <br /> at the last Council work session, there was <br /> discussion on hiring a consulting firm on <br /> looking at a section of Highway 10 that is <br /> further to the north of Mounds View Square. <br /> The Planning Commission inquired if, along <br /> that section of Highway 10, the consultant will <br /> be looking at some design theme, and added if <br /> they are thinking big picture this should be a <br /> suitable theme that could be extended further <br /> along Highway 10. Director Sheldon believes <br /> that if the Planning Commission sets a good <br /> standard on this site, we will be okay on other <br /> shopping center sites that propose different <br /> signage. <br /> Commissioner Obert again expressed some <br /> concern and thinks the Planning Commission <br /> needs to make sure that these standards are <br /> set high enough. <br /> Commissioner Brasaemle inquired as to what <br /> the applicant's general sense of what dinner <br /> house restaurant tenant feelings are on pylon <br /> versus monument signage. Mr. Edward Paster <br />