My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-19-1997
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
11-19-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2018 11:36:44 AM
Creation date
7/26/2018 11:36:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Minutes
Date
11/19/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission November 19, 1997 <br /> Special Meeting Page 6 <br /> Planner Peters continued: <br /> 13. The reference to "NERP" ponds, an incorrect spelling, will be corrected to <br /> read "NURP" prior to City Council action. <br /> 14. Three additional handicap parking stalls are required to be shown on Lot 2 <br /> adjacent to the building's main entrance. In addition, site plans must be <br /> modified, in accordance with ADA requirements, to show one handicap <br /> parking space per every 25 parking spaces in the underground parking <br /> facility. The applicant has agreed to make these revisions. <br /> Commissioner Johnston asked if the parking stalls, as shown on the plan,met City <br /> requirements. <br /> Planner Peters told the Commission that there were an adequate number of parking <br /> spaces to meet City Code and added that the PUD itself is over-parked. <br /> Planner Peters continued: <br /> • 15. Parking stalls on Lots 2-4 meet the minimum 180 square feet size but are <br /> 10'x18' instead of the standard 9'x20'. It is recommended by SRF that the <br /> extra width is desirable and the loss in length will not be detrimental to on- <br /> site parking. The PUD will be amended to reflect this change. <br /> Commissioner Brasaemle brought to the Commission's attention the fact that the site <br /> plan and elevation plan show the ramp on different sides of the building where as the plans <br /> should both show the ramp in the same location. <br /> - - . ..• •: : •s correct-and <br /> this inaccuracy was an oversight on his part and the drawings would be corrected to <br /> reflect current conditions. <br /> Planner Peters continued: <br /> 16. Conflicts in the landscaping plan will be amended so that planting details <br /> will appear only on sheet 1 of the Landscaping Plan and on sheet L1 for the <br /> Holiday Stationstore. <br /> 17. The PUD agreement will be amended so that language is included that <br /> reflects the owners intent to recycle at least 60 percent of the water used in <br /> • the car wash facility. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.