Laserfiche WebLink
S Mounds View Planning Commission June 17, 1998 <br /> Special Meeting Page 5 <br /> Motion/Second: Brasaemle/Miller to approve Resolution No. 553-98, as amended, a resolution <br /> recommending to the City Council approval of a development review as requested by Realife <br /> Cooperative of Mounds View; Planning Case No. 530-98, with stipulations, as amended. <br /> Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 <br /> The motion carried. <br /> 6. <br /> Planning Case No. 527-98 <br /> 3025 County Road H <br /> Applicant: Duane and Nancy Peterson <br /> Consideration of Resolution No. 549-98, a resolution recommending approval of a minor <br /> subdivision to the City Council. <br /> • The applicant, Duane Peterson was present. <br /> Associate Ericson gave his report as follows: <br /> Duane and Nancy Peterson were requesting approval of a minor subdivision to create two <br /> lots from their property located at 3025 County Road H. A copy of the required <br /> surveyor's certificate showing the proposed lot split was presented. The property <br /> currently has 100 feet of frontage on Pleasant View Drive and 225 feet along County <br /> Road H. The applicant was proposing to split off the west 125 feet of the lot to create a <br /> 12,500 square foot corner lot. The remaining 100 foot by 100 foot lot, 10,000 square <br /> fcct, would be 1,000 square feet too small to be a legal lot by Mounds View standards. In <br /> order to rectify this situation, the applicant had arranged to purchase a 10 foot wide by <br /> 100 foot long strip of property from the neighbor to the east, Mr. Steve Borden, residing <br /> at 3009 County Road H. A simple deeded land transfer would be executed between Mr. <br /> Borden and Mr. Peterson to accomplish the land acquisition. <br /> The proposed legal descriptions and certificate of survey had been reviewed by the City's <br /> Engineering Technician. The City Attorney has been asked to draft an easement <br /> document to convey the drainage and utility easements. <br /> It was stated that a $825 park dedication fee, 5 percent of the value of the land not <br /> including the land under the existing home, would need to be collected as a condition of <br /> approval. There was also an unpaid water utility bill that Ericson requested the applicant <br />