Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING COMMISSION Page 6 <br /> August 19, 1998 <br /> Peterson asked the applicant how they intended to meet staffs recommendation that the east side <br /> drive have a minimum ten-foot setback. <br /> John Trumble, Setter Leech and Lindstrom, project architects, stated the 50-foot drive aisle and <br /> zero setback, as requested in the development review, was felt to be the ideal traffic situation for <br /> the facilities operation and requested the Commission to consider this request and this request <br /> only. SYSCO has calculated dimensions needed for the safety of its visitors, employees, and <br /> truck drivers and the dimensions requested on the plan indicated the studies that were done to <br /> achieve these safety dimensions. <br /> Obert suggested a container wall on the east side driveway to ensure that no pollutants entered <br /> into the wetland from the SYSCO facility. <br /> Mr. Trumble stated there were aesthetic issues as well as operational issues that would not allow <br /> this type of structure. <br /> Miller asked how many new employees would be added with SYSCO's planned expansion. <br /> • Mr. Trumble stated an additional 100 people, from 450 to 550, would be added as a result of the <br /> expansion. <br /> Stevenson stated he would be in favor of eliminating the stipulation requiring a ten-foot setback as <br /> recommended by staff to accommodate the applicant's dimensional requests(50-foot-access- <br /> driveway width)that are based on the safety needs of SYSCO's visitor, employees, and truck <br /> drivers. <br /> Brasaemle asked what the proposed snow storage would be and if the original PUD had <br /> requirements for snow storage. <br /> Mr. Trumble stated parking spaces are sacrificed so that snow storage can be accommodated. <br /> Ericson stated there is no specific requirement in the PUD for snow storage other than the issue <br /> be addressed and a plan be stated by the developer. <br /> Obert asked what the recourse would be for a property owner pushing snow into a protected <br /> wetland. <br /> Jopke stated it would be an issue for the City's Code enforcement and the violation would subject <br /> the perpetrator to fines. <br /> SMOTION/SECOND: Obert/Brasaemle to approve Resolution No. 555-98, a Resolution <br />