09-16-1998 PC - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• PLANNING COMMISSION Page 4 September 16, 1998 Miller asked if the island between the two parking lots would remain. Dan Hall, told the Commission the island would remain "as is." Obert recommended adding that final approval be contingent upon execution, and recordation of the easement document. MOTION/SECOND: ObertBrasaemle to approve Resolution No. 560-98, a Resolution Approving a Variance Request to Allow a Joint Use Parking and Access Arrangement between the Businesses and a Zero-Foot Parking Lot Setback, as amended, for 2200 & 2214 Highway 10, Daniel Hall representing the Mermaid. VOTE: Ayes - 6 Nays - 0 Motion carried 6. Planning Case No. 535-98 Property Involved: 8111 Eastwood Road • Consideration of Resolution No. 558-98, a Resolution approving a Variance to Allow for two Curb Cuts. Applicant: Michael Tobias The applicant, Michael Tobias, was not present. Associate Ericson gave his report as follows: The applicant was requesting a variance from the Code requirement that states a single-family property shall be limited to only one curb cut. Earlier this year, the applic• i a• • • a • I• permit to resurface his driveway, which had access onto both Sherwood Road and Eastwood Road. At that time staff indicated that a building permit could not be approved due to the nonconforming nature of the driveway, unless the access to Sherwood Road was removed. The applicant agreed and the permit was issued. Subsequent reinspection of the property showed that both access points remained, both having been improved contrary to the permit. The applicant was notified in writing that they had two alternatives to resolve the situation: 1. Remove the driveway access to Sherwood Road 2. Apply for and receive a variance • The applicant chose to apply for a variance in order to maintain the driveway in its present condition.