My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-16-1998 PC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
09-16-1998 PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2018 5:16:56 AM
Creation date
7/27/2018 5:16:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Minutes
Date
9/16/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• PLANNING COMMISSION Page 5 <br /> September 16, 1998 <br /> To understand the predominance of the type of driveway configuration present at 8111 Eastwood <br /> Road, staff surveyed corner properties north of Hillview between Groveland and Long Lake <br /> Road. There are 54 corner lots in this area, of which ten(18.5 percent) have multiple curb cuts. <br /> In comparison, the percentage of all residential properties with more than one curb cut is less than <br /> one percent. Corner properties present unique safety issues, with as many as four distinct paths of <br /> traffic to monitor while backing out of the driveway. Some corner lots, because of tree cover, <br /> shrubs and other plantings, have limited visibility thereby increasing the safety risk. <br /> The applicant hired an asphalt company to do the required driveway demolition and <br /> reconstruction work. The contractor read and was aware of the City's request that the curb cut <br /> onto Sherwood Road was to be removed. It was the opinion of staff that the contractor made an <br /> error in not removing the curb cut as requested by the City and also written into the work <br /> contract that the Tobias family had with the contractor. <br /> Staff gave no recommendation but offered the Planning Commission "Option A" and "Option D" <br /> of Resolution No. 558-98, Approval or Denial respectively. <br /> Chairperson Peterson returned the floor to the Commission for questions of staff. <br /> • A discussion was held in regards to what constituted maintenance and what constituted <br /> reconstruction. The Code allows "improvement" of existing conditions as long as they are not <br /> "expanded." <br /> It was the consensus of the Commission that the contractor was aware that the Sherwood Road <br /> curb cut was to be removed and that the new work would include a turn around area in place of <br /> the old driveway, per the drawing, specified dimensions and quoted prices for the work. <br /> Obert stated there was no hardship to justify the variance. He added, the problem that the <br /> property owner now faces was brought on by an error made by the contractor and the contractor <br /> is the one who should be responsible for correcting the error, with no charge to the home owner. <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Brasaemle/Miller to approve Resolution No. 558-98 "Option D"Denial of <br /> a Variance for Two Curb Cuts, as amended, 8111 Eastwood Road, Michael Tobias. <br /> VOTE: Ayes - 6 Nays- 0 Motion carried <br /> 7. Staff Reports/Information Items <br /> A. Highway 10 Design Theme <br /> • Director Jopke gave his report as follows: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.