Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission November 17, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 19 <br /> • Planning Associate Ericson stated this subdivision addresses zero lot line subdivided lots, as well as <br /> typical R-2 lots, and it would be logical to make this consistent. <br /> Planning Associate Ericson stated staff would make the requested changes and bring a resolution <br /> forward to the City Council. He advised that a public hearing would be set for the first reading of <br /> the ordinance, as this matter is in contemplation of an amendment to the Zoning Code. <br /> 8. Special Planning Case No. SP-071-99 <br /> A. Consideration of Resolution 597-99, a Resolution Recommending Denial of <br /> Proposed Ordinance 644 Relating to Billboards. <br /> Community Development Director Jopke stated this item has come before the Planning Commission <br /> at several previous meetings, and is the discussion of an ordinance to amend the City Code to allow <br /> billboards by Conditional Use Permit, and setting standards in terms of size location, spacing, <br /> orientation, height, and obstruction factors. <br /> Community Development Director Jopke stated staff has drafted Ordinance 644, which has been <br /> discussed by the Planning Commission. He indicated the consensus of the Commission at the <br /> previous meeting was to forward a recommendation of denial of the ordinance, because they felt <br /> billboards were not an appropriate use in the locations discussed. He stated that based upon the <br /> Commission's direction, staff has drafted a resolution that recommends denial of Ordinance 644 to <br /> the City Council, with four findings, as follows: <br /> 1. Large billboard signs are not appropriate uses of property within CRP Conservation <br /> Recreational Preservation and PF Public Facilities zoning districts. These districts are <br /> intended to provide recreational opportunities, open space, and protect the natural <br /> environment where possible. Large advertising signs are not consistent with that <br /> intent, and are more appropriate to commercial and industrial zoning districts. <br /> 2. Large billboard signs can be visually distracting and may detract from the <br /> neighborhood and promote a negative image for the community. <br /> 3. The City Attorney has advised City staff that the City cannot limit billboards to city- <br /> owned properties only. <br /> 4. A permit will be required from the State of Minnesota to locate billboards along state <br /> and federal highways. State statutes restrict such signs to commercial and industrial <br /> zoning districts only. The contemplated sites for additional billboards are not zoned <br /> commercial or industrial. <br /> Community Development Director Jopke stated Resolution No. 597-99 indicates that the Planning <br /> Commission recommends the City Council does not approve Ordinance 644, and that this <br /> recommendation be forwarded to the Council, prior to final approval of the Planning Commission <br /> i <br />