02-19-1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

UNAPPROVED Mounds View Planning Commission February 5, 1992 • Regular Meeting Page 2 When this case was discussed previously at Agenda Session, Staff was asked to investigate the issue of drainage at the site. Planner Harrington distributed a memo from City Engineer Ric Minetor, who did not recommend on-site water detention. Chair Mountin requested that the contents of the memo be incorporated into the Resolution. Motion/Second: Miller/Nelson to approve Resolution No. 328-92, as amended. 7 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Planner Harrington moved on to Planning 6 . Consideration Case 335-91, amendment to Planned Unit of Resolution Development at 2260/2280 Highway 10. He 329-92, noted that this case had been discussed regarding at the previous agenda session and that Planned Unit Tim Nelson was present to represent the Development • applicant, Everest Development. amendment for Everest Mr. Nelson prefaced his comments on this Development at case by asking the Commission if they Mounds View might also consider taking action on Business Park another Everest proposal not on the South agenda, namely the Conditional Use Permit (C.U.P. ) application for a Saturn Dealership at 2375 Highway 10. He indicated that Saturn was expressing concerns regarding timing and that they were willing to consider the C.U.P. and the Major Subdivision/Jackson Drive issues at separate times . Chair Mountin replied that she would poll the Commissioners on this request following action on the case at hand. Mr. Nelson reviewed plans to add land into the Mounds View Business Park South Planned Unit Development (P.U.D) to add a 190 stall parking lot. He stated that Everest had received a favorable opinion from the City Forester on the land- scaping, which would provide screening111 between the northwest corner of the