Laserfiche WebLink
40 Mounds View Planning Commission February 5, 1992 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 3 <br /> parking lot and the adjacent property. <br /> Mr. Nelson then addressed Mr. Paron's <br /> concerns regarding trespassers on his <br /> property. There would be a five to six <br /> foot drop in grading with a retaining <br /> wall between the parking lot and Mr. <br /> Paron's property. Everest Development <br /> believes that this plan is preferable to <br /> an unsightly fence. <br /> Mr. Paron asked about drainage on the <br /> site; he was told by Mr. Nelson that the <br /> site was designed so that water would <br /> flow back onto the parking lot and not <br /> onto Mr. Paron's land. <br /> Chair Mountin asked Mr. Paron if he had <br /> any concerns regarding lighting. He <br /> replied that he did not, as he actually <br /> preferred that the site be well lit. <br /> • Commissioner Nelson asked Tim Nelson <br /> about the loss of oak trees on the site. <br /> Tim Nelson indicated that five to six <br /> trees in the right-of-way would be kept, <br /> but that unfortunately, the rest would <br /> be lost. <br /> Commissioner Peterson asked about the <br /> fate of the house at 2280 Woodale Drive. <br /> Mr. Nelson stated that it would be move <br /> off site and hopefully used elsewhere. <br /> Commissioner Peterson then relayed a <br /> concern from a resident regarding the <br /> possible increase in noise from Highway <br /> 10 in adjacent residential areas once <br /> the lot is cleared. <br /> Commissioner Nelson brought up the issue <br /> of truck traffic in the Mounds View <br /> Business Park South area. Tim Nelson <br /> affirmed that some trucks were missing <br /> the turn into the Business Park and were <br /> turning around in residential streets. <br /> Tim Nelson stated that Everest planned <br /> • to improve signage in the area to <br /> alleviate this problem. <br />