My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-15-1992
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
04-15-1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2018 10:24:42 AM
Creation date
7/27/2018 10:23:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
4/15/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
UNAPPROVED <br /> Mounds View Planning Commission April 1, 1992 • <br /> Regular Meeting Page 2 <br /> Motion/Second: Stevenson/Nelson to <br /> adopt Resolution No. 334-92, <br /> recommending approval of a major <br /> subdivsion for Everest Development at <br /> 2375 Highway 10. <br /> 5 ayes 0 nay Motion Carried <br /> Planner Harrington updated the Comm- 6 . Consideration <br /> ission on the progress made on plans for of Resolution <br /> parking at the proposed Twin City School No. 335-92, <br /> of Pet Grooming, 2840 Highway 10. The Regarding <br /> City Attorney had been contacted regard- Conditional Use <br /> ing the number of spaces needed and he Permit for Pet <br /> determined that since the school would Grooming <br /> be a new use for the building, it would Facility, Twin <br /> need to provide for 18 parking spaces, City School of <br /> the number required by the current code. Pet Grooming, <br /> 2840 Highway 10 <br /> The applicant, Mary Bourke, showed the <br /> Commission with a parking plan that she <br /> felt would provide the required spaces . • <br /> Planner Harrington noted that some of <br /> the spaces that shown wouldn't be <br /> acceptable to the Fire Department. <br /> Because the building is not set up with <br /> a sprinkler system, Fire Code requires <br /> that 24 feet of the outside of the park- <br /> ing lot be kept clear for fire vehicles . <br /> The Commission then discussed several <br /> possible solutions to the applicant's <br /> dilemma, but none would meet all cond- <br /> itions of the present code. <br /> Chair Mountin commented that the parking <br /> area available is really too small for <br /> the amount of parking needed and that <br /> the property owner may have to acquire <br /> or use property from adjoining lots in <br /> order to get enough parking space for <br /> the building. She also stated that when <br /> the use changes on a building, the city <br /> must bring the property up to code. <br /> Ms. Bourke stated that she didn't see • <br /> why she would need 18 parking spots, as <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.