Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> UNAPPROVED <br /> Mounds View Planning Commission April 1, 1992 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 3 <br /> most of her customers don't park for all <br /> that long; they drop off their pets in <br /> the morning and pick them up at night. <br /> Chair Mountin again stated that when a <br /> use changes, the city must use current <br /> code standards. She also stated that <br /> with the grooming staff and nine to ten <br /> students parking each day, there would <br /> not be much room left for any cars. <br /> The Commissioners expressed their desire <br /> for the business to stay in the city, <br /> and made suggestions about other proper- <br /> ties that the applicant might rent. <br /> Chair Mountin asked the applicant how <br /> much time she had to make a decision <br /> regarding this property. The applicant <br /> indicated that she would like to speak <br /> • with the property owner to see if a <br /> solution can be found to the parking <br /> problem before looking elsewhere. <br /> Motion/Second: Stevenson/Peterson to <br /> table Resolution No. 335-92, with the <br /> option of calling to order at the Agenda <br /> Session April 15, 1992 to take action on <br /> the matter. <br /> 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br /> Planner Harring on ou ine• e nex <br /> case, Planning Case No. 334-92, variance of Resolution <br /> request of Mac-May Homes. The applicant No. 336-92, <br /> is asking to construct a home at 2673 Regarding Var- <br /> Sherwood Road with a side yard setback iance Request <br /> of five feet where a ten foot setback is of Mac-May <br /> required and with a front yard setback Homes at 2673 <br /> of 30 .5 feet where a setback of 58 feet Sherwood Road <br /> is required. When the lot was sub- <br /> divided and platted in 1986, the City <br /> Council required that the home have a 58 <br /> foot front setback to keep the home in <br /> line with the three homes to the east. <br /> In 1991, the Planning Commission denied <br /> • a variance request similar to this one, <br /> but the City Council overturned that <br />