My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-24-1996
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
07-24-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2024 9:11:34 PM
Creation date
7/31/2018 11:10:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
7/24/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
140
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT B • <br />Gary Kretschmer states that he will be sending a memo to planning tomorrow and it would help <br />to have as many of their comments as possible tonight, but that we are open to comments in <br />writing. The Planning Board meeting will be next Thursday. Gary would like to get as much <br />information to the Planning Board as soon as possible. He fears that if he tries to give them too <br />much information at the meeting that they may not make a decision and they are on a very tight <br />time schedule. <br />Gary Pultz also asks what level do we need a tutorial on the basics of cellular technology, or are <br />we familiar enough to put it in a non -technical form. Those elements are crucial to them and they <br />want those concerns in the regulations. <br />Richard Varnes says there appears to be a wide variety of structures that accomplish our purpose. <br />Accomplishing these guidelines in words is a tricky path. We may miss important details and we <br />need to abstract more clearly what essential features we need. <br />Ann Closser of US West New Vector Group (499-0710) with Jeffrey Pond, an attorney with US <br />West, would like a follow-up on antennas. She feels that the proposed regulations limit options. <br />She doesn't like the inability to use other structures to screen antennas. When you put antennas <br />behind a fiberglass screen, you can't tell the difference between cellular antennas and what's <br />already on the roof. <br />Richard Vames asks if any of these pictures ( and/or computer simulations) will be available for <br />Planning Board to look at. <br />Ann Closser is proposing three sets of antennas and there are other mechanisms. She would like <br />to have the flexibility to accommodate different structures. They have built structures (Jefferson <br />County) where the antennas are behind screens on towers. <br />Richard asks if there are copies of local ordinances or designing guidelines that the City can look <br />at? <br />• <br />Ann Closser has the Jefferson County regulations available. <br />One example is an antennae that transmits inside of a building. <br />Richard confirmed that the draft ordinance states that all base station equipment should be <br />mounted internally in the building <br />Gary Pultz stated that the requirements for equipment are getting smaller since industry is going <br />digital and now they are using cabinets instead of buildings. <br />Ann Closser also feels that they are limited in height and that no increase in height will be allowed <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.