Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT B <br />Gary Kretschmer addresses principal use and appurtenant use saying that there are different <br />standards with pertinence and separate standards established for principal uses. They are in <br />separate use categories altogether. He also states that the City has rigid height restrictions; <br />because of a vote of citizens 55ft is the maximum height in this community and the minimum of <br />pertinencies is above 55 ft. <br />What about non -conforming buildings that were built before the ordinance? <br />The ordinance specifically limits what we can do on those structures. That's why they wrote that <br />anything over 55ft would have to be wall mounted. It is doubtful that we can put structures on <br />pertinence or principle uses on the tops of those buildings. The City doesn't have the amount of <br />flexibility that they'd like. <br />Someone stated that the draft they've seen doesn't have that distinction. <br />Gary Kretschmer states that under design criteria in the draft ordinance there was a distinction <br />made. They made a distinction between 2 buildings that just require antennas on walls of all <br />structures and the previous ordinance did not distinguish. <br />Alan Boles says he would strongly prefer options of being able to put antennas on buildings nncIe;r <br />55 ft. <br />Ann Closser states that in the definitional section antenna needs clarification because typically a <br />PCS cell facility will have 3 sectors. <br />Richard Varnes wanted PCS Unit defined? Would a "base station" not include an antenna? <br />Ann Closser states that a telecommunications facility should have no more than so many sq. ft. <br />per facility. <br />Richard Varnes states that the City will rework the definition <br />Ann Closser stated that paging companies may be approaching the City for facilities. <br />Alan Boles notes in one of the pictures shown by Ann Closser that they have antennas mounted <br />on lightpoles and another picture where one is mounted on a light pole in a sports stadium. <br />Would they also want Boulder to allow them to mount antennas to poles or other structures such <br />as church steeples, water towers etc...? <br />Ann Closser stated that yes they are proposing the above. <br />Alan Boles asks if there are any other structures they are considering? <br />