My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-24-1996
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
07-24-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2024 9:11:34 PM
Creation date
7/31/2018 11:10:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
7/24/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
140
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ATTACpLMENI' B <br />Richard. Varnes asks how important use of structures is to industry? The City Council <br />may have concerns broadening the use beyond buildings. New towers would be very problematic. <br />Jill Jelinek says that new poles are not on the table, only existing structures. <br />(Speaker?) re -states that we would not be putting up new poles, but putting antennas on existing <br />structures. <br />Larry Storms with SASI (277-9090) says he feels; that we are limiting creativity. He has worked <br />on many changes and is trying to create a means of control to disguise facilities. They are also <br />trying to set up a system that provides a competitive system for citizens <br />Larry also says that in #5 the ordinance states that all equipment is required to be operated inside <br />of the building below the roof. He says that this is no longer the need since industry has gone <br />digital and they are now using cabinets. They are able to set them on the roof and shouldn't <br />preclude that option. Is it visually protrusive? <br />Richard Vannes stated that we need to define size, noise, and we also need dimensional <br />information on base stations. <br />Larry says that we could do this with conditions, i.e. either be screened or add to the roof. <br />He is also concerned with #7 in the ordinance where it states that no antenna may be placed on <br />property that has been designated as a City landmark. He gives us one example of a colonial <br />mansion where they took the columns and replaced them with fiberglass RF neutral of the exact <br />size and shape and said they are indistinguishable from the originals. They would not want to <br />have that precluded because he feels it would be a lost opportunity. <br />Corey Ford Vice President of base station development for the US West wireless group wanted to <br />thank the City for their effort made to accommodate the industry. He thinks that the City has <br />done a great job in a short amount of time on a complirgr d issue. They would like to refine the <br />ordinance, and would propose that the City would continue to engage all members of the industry <br />on these issues, and he has provided a draft revision to ordinance. <br />Richard Varnes states that he has not yet received this draft revision and that staff has not had <br />time to look at it. <br />Corey Ford says he would be glad to have it served as a vehicle for discussion. One of his <br />concerns is the issue of building above the height of existing buildings. He said it is a practical <br />necessity and they need to have antennas above the edge of buildings and they can blend in with <br />the color and the style of the building. He agrees that the concept of having a base station facility <br />inside is not necessary. He also says that PCS can be contained in a cabinet about 5x5x10 next to <br />a building on the ground and it's easier to maintain them on the ground with out having to climb <br />on top of a building. Corey also says that standard radio emissions should be based on FCC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.