02-05-2003 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Commission) review a set of specified criteria for each application and make its decision in accordance with these criteria. These criteria are set forth in Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2, of the City Code. The Code clearly states that a hardship exists when all of the criteria are met. The individual criteria are as follows: a. Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances apply to the property which do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone or vicinity and result from lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since the effective date hereof have had no control. The property is zoned R-3 and is improved with a four unit residential dwelling. The property is similar to the other four-unit dwellings in this area of the City. The lot is not irregularly shaped however there is a slope toward the rear of the property and a drainage easement that restricts development in this area. b. The literal interpretation of the provisions of this Title would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this Title. The subject property appears similar to the majority of R-3 zoned properties in this area. The literal interpretation of the provisions found in the Zoning Code would not deprive the applicant of rights enjoyed by other properties in the same zone, in that no other property owner is seeking to increase density by expanding to a six unit residential dwelling. c. That the special conditions or circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. The four-plexes in this area may have been constructed prior to the enactment of the zoning code provision which requires garage stalls for each unit. To that end, the property is considered a legal, non-conforming use. Increasing the density, however, is an action of the property owner. d. That granting the variance requested would not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this Title to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district. Granting the variance would confer upon the property owner a special privilege that would be denied other property owners. To expand one’s property, one must have adequate parking to meet the increased demand. e. That the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. Economic conditions alone shall not be considered a hardship. The variance requested is twofold—a reduction in the number of garage stalls and a reduction in the total number of parking stalls provided. Because it appears as though additional parking could be added to the site, the variance requested is not the minimum to alleviate the hardship. f. The variance would not be materially detrimental to the purpose of this Title or to other property in the same zone. Granting a variance to allow the expansion of the structure from a four unit building to a six