My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2005/02/14
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Agenda Packets - 2005/02/14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:29 PM
Creation date
7/31/2018 12:32:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/14/2005
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
2/14/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
165
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council January 24, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 14 <br /> <br /> 1 <br />Finance Director Hanson stated he had received a request from one of the people who had 2 <br />retired before the this last option was available, asking that past retirees be allowed to join the 3 <br />program also. He stated that he had contacted ICM, who had stated that it would be allowed 4 <br />within certain provisions. One is that the money would have to be considered an employer 5 <br />contribution rather than an employee contribution, and the City would have to require all 6 <br />employees with remaining balances in their accounts to contribute. 7 <br /> 8 <br />Finance Director Hanson stated that he wanted to check with the Council to see if they were 9 <br />open to this idea prior to contacting the other two retirees to see if they were interested. He 10 <br />stated he would only recommend doing this if all of the potential employees were in favor. 11 <br />He suspects that all three will probably be in favor given the tax advantages. He stated that 12 <br />the cost to the City would be fairly minor. 13 <br /> 14 <br />Mayor Marty asked that if you consider the Finance Department’s time spent keeping these 15 <br />people quasi on the payroll, wouldn’t that help their department? 16 <br /> 17 <br />Finance Director Hanson stated that there would be some savings in terms of streamlining 18 <br />administratively, and it would be hard to quantify that in terms of dollars and offset that 19 <br />against the interest income that would be lost. 20 <br /> 21 <br />Mayor Marty stated he wouldn’t want to impose this on anyone after they had retired. 22 <br /> 23 <br />Council Member Stigney stated that when people retire, they retire under certain conditions 24 <br />which shouldn’t be changed later. 25 <br /> 26 <br />Council Member Flaherty stated that he felt they should be given the option of what they 27 <br />wanted to do. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Mayor Marty asked what Finance Director Hanson’s recommendation would be. 30 <br /> 31 <br />Finance Director Hanson stated that he saw this as being of minimal cost to the City in terms of 32 <br />lost interest, and he felt this clears up an issue in terms of differences of opinion of whether 33 <br />or not the continued participation in the Employees Group Health Plan is a taxable event, and 34 <br />he maintains that it is, and he feels he is on pretty sold ground on that. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Council Member Gunn asked if all others who retire in the future would have this option. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Finance Director Hanson stated that they can make their individual choice. He stated that the 39 <br />ICM plan with the tax benefits is so beneficial to the employees, he would be surprised if 40 <br />anybody chose the old way from this point forward. 41 <br /> 42 <br />Mayor Marty stated that he would recommend contacting these three employees, and if they 43 <br />are all in agreement, to bring them back to the Council. 44 <br /> 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.