My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2005/04/25
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Agenda Packets - 2005/04/25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:35 PM
Creation date
7/31/2018 1:12:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
4/25/2005
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
4/25/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
214
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council March 28, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 9 <br /> <br />Public Works Director Lee stated that the logic with using UHL is they know the system, and it 1 <br />would be cheaper than using a company that don’t know the details of it. 2 <br /> 3 <br />Council Member Flaherty stated he would like a better breakdown on what the $8,000 would be 4 <br />used for. 5 <br /> 6 <br />Mayor Marty asked if they wanted to move to table this item until they got more information. 7 <br /> 8 <br />Council Member Gunn asked what the incentive was for them to get it done in two days for the 9 <br />$5,000. 10 <br /> 11 <br />Public Works Director Lee stated that the City has built a very good trust relationship with UHL. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Council Member Stigney asked if there was any warranty on this and for what time period. 14 <br /> 15 <br />Public Works Director Lee stated that he would have to get back to him on that because he didn’t 16 <br />know if there was a warranty on the gears they were putting in. 17 <br /> 18 <br />Council Member Stigney asked what “all materials guaranteed to be specified” meant in the 19 <br />second paragraph of UHL’s proposal. 20 <br /> 21 <br />Public Works Director Lee stated he didn’t know what that meant. 22 <br /> 23 <br />Council Member Stigney asked whether anyone had gone back to the manufacturer for their 24 <br />recommendations. 25 <br /> 26 <br />Council Member Flaherty stated that they couldn’t go back to the factory because they would 27 <br />send them to a distributor. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Council Member Gunn asked how urgent this matter was. 30 <br /> 31 <br />Public Works Director Lee stated that it could be tabled until the next Council meeting, and right 32 <br />now the unit is red tagged and shut off, and due to the time of year, it should be okay to wait. 33 <br /> 34 <br />MOTION/SECOND. Thomas/Flaherty. To table this item until the next Council meeting. 35 <br /> 36 <br /> Ayes-5 Nays-0 Motion carried. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Bill Warner, 2765 Sherwood Road, asked if it turned out to be $5,000 if the Council would was 39 <br />going to accept less money. 40 <br /> 41 <br />Mayor Marty stated that they were going to pay less money. 42 <br /> 43 <br />Mr. Warner asked if anybody would be embarrassed about working with the lower bid, and then 44 <br />having it come back to them and asking for more if it’s really necessary. 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.