Agenda Packets - 2005/04/25 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View City Council April 11, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 5 9. COUNCIL BUSINESS. 1 2 A. Resolution 6495 Setting a Public Hearing for Monday, April 25, 2005 at 7:15 3 pm for the City Hall Rehabilitation Project. 4 5 Public Works Director Lee stated that this item is on Council business to make it known to the 6 public that the City is interested in learning more about this proposed project, and there will be a 7 Power Point presentation given on April 25th. 8 9 Acting Mayor Stigney asked if there were any questions for the Public Works Director. He asked 10 whether this item was premature because the Council hadn’t established what they wanted to do. 11 12 Public Works Director Lee stated that the proposed project will be presented that evening. He 13 stated that if they preferred they could do a proposal, present the proposal, and then have a public 14 hearing afterward, but all in the same night. 15 16 Council Member Gunn stated she was going by the list they had received that was basically the 17 basic fixes that need to be done to the building. 18 19 Council Member Flaherty asked if those were the figures he was going to introduce. 20 21 Public Works Director Lee stated that was right, and it would be the same items introduced on 22 April 4th at the work session. 23 24 MOTION/SECOND. Gunn/Thomas. To waive the reading and approve Resolution 6495 Setting 25 a Public Hearing for Monday, April 25, 2005 at 7:15 p.m. for the City Hall Rehabilitation 26 Project. 27 28 Ayes-4 Nays-0 Motion carried. 29 30 B. Review Appeal from Tim Nelson Representing Property Owner Christen 31 Properties, LLC, Regarding the Connection of 2310 County Road 10 to 32 Municipal Water and Sanitary Sewer Services (Ericson) 33 34 Director Ericson stated that Mr. Tim Nelson, representing the property owner, Crystal Properties, 35 has requested an appeal to waive the connection requirement for city water and sewer. He stated 36 this was an ordinance that the City adopted back in 1992 that had required property owners to 37 hook up prior to that. He stated the Council had been provided with the correspondence between 38 the property owner and the City. He stated the City has asked that the property owner either 39 connect or come up with a redevelopment plan. He stated that Mr. Nelson did submit a 40 redevelopment plan, but it was incomplete in that it did not have signatures or consent of the 41 property owners of all of the property owners involved in the redevelopment, and he rejected the 42 application, and that the City will work with the property owners . He stated they need to have a 43 connection to the city water and sewer or have the City Council approve of a waiver, and that can 44 either take the form of a one-year waiver with an escrow deposit or be a permanent waiver. He 45