My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2005/05/09
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Agenda Packets - 2005/05/09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:52 PM
Creation date
7/31/2018 1:17:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
5/9/2005
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
5/9/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council April 25, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 9 <br /> <br />options and what is available to them as recourse. She stated that now they know that the 1 <br />Council has heard their concerns. 2 <br /> 3 <br />Council Member Thomas assured the residents that Council is listening to them. She explained 4 <br />that by approving this household they would be dealing with a higher threshold and would have 5 <br />some authority to enforce the permit requirements. She stated that the criteria would be outlined 6 <br />in the approved resolution. 7 <br /> 8 <br />Council Member Flaherty agreed with Council member Thomas and clarified that neither party is 9 <br />asking that the government step in to resolve. She noted that they are asking for the additional 10 <br />60-days in order to allow the dogs to acclimate and prove that the dogs would be fine in their 11 <br />new environment. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Mr. Stoltz stated that delays are foolish, as permits can be pulled any time. He stated that the 14 <br />outlined standards would hold them to a higher standard. He stated that if there are any problems 15 <br />they would surface quickly, as will the solutions. He suggested going for the higher standard, put 16 <br />some teeth to the criteria and resolve it tonight. 17 <br /> 18 <br />City Attorney Riggs explained that the City Council and the Residents do have options under 19 <br />Chapter 601 and Chapter 701 of the City Code. He confirmed that it is true that a conditional use 20 <br />permit would hold the property owner to a higher standard. He stated that they could also insert 21 <br />additional details that are law abiding. He stated that the resolution does specifically speak to the 22 <br />conditions that would have to be satisfied. 23 <br /> 24 <br />MOTION/SECOND. Gunn/Thomas. To Approve Resolution number 6507 with amendments 25 <br />stating that any usage of the property, as it relates to dogs, will abide by all local, county and state 26 <br />laws. 27 <br /> 28 <br /> Ayes-4 Nays-0 Motion carried. 29 <br /> 30 <br />B. 7:10 p.m. Public Hearing to Consider a Conditional Use Permit for an 31 <br />Oversized Garage at 7965 Fairchild Avenue 32 <br /> 33 <br />Ms. Prososki stated that Rebecca and Brian are requesting a conditional use permit for an 34 <br />oversized garage at 7965 Fairchild Avenue. She reviewed the setback requirements with Council 35 <br />noting that they must be five feet from the property line and twelve feet from the rear. She stated 36 <br />that the conditional use permit satisfies all code requirements. She stated that initially the 37 <br />neighbors were concerned that the garage would be used as a place of business noting that the 38 <br />intent is for additional storage. She stated that the Planning Commission has held the public 39 <br />hearing and taken testimony from the residents and is recommending approval of the request. 40 <br /> 41 <br />Mayor Marty opened the public hearing at 9:42 p.m. 42 <br /> 43 <br />Mayor Marty closed the public hearing at 9:43 p.m. 44 <br /> 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.