My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2005/05/09
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Agenda Packets - 2005/05/09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:52 PM
Creation date
7/31/2018 1:17:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
5/9/2005
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
5/9/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council April 25, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 10 <br /> <br />Council Member Gunn noted that there were a lot of questions asked at the public hearing and 1 <br />that all questions and concerns were addressed. She asked if the shed would stay. 2 <br /> 3 <br />Ms. Prososki stated that according to City Code the shed does not have to be removed. She 4 <br />stated that the applicants plan to remove the shed due to space issues in the backyard. 5 <br /> 6 <br />Mayor Marty stated that the Staff report under-demonstrates their need and asked where the 7 <br />trailer and boat are currently located. 8 <br /> 9 <br />Ms. Prososki stated that the trailer and boat are parked on the property in accordance to City 10 <br />Code. 11 <br /> 12 <br />MOTION/SECOND. Thomas/Flaherty. To Approve Resolution 6505 approving a Conditional 13 <br />Use Permit for an Oversized Garage located at 7965 Fairchild Avenue. 14 <br /> 15 <br /> Ayes-4 Nays-0 Motion carried. 16 <br /> 17 <br />C. 7:15 p.m. Public Hearing to Consider the City Hall Rehabilitation Project 18 <br /> 19 <br />Nancy Schultz provided the Council with a presentation for the proposed City Hall Rehabilitation 20 <br />Project. She reviewed the purpose of the presentation stating that they would like to obtain 21 <br />feedback and direction from Council regarding the continuation of the rehabilitation of City Hall. 22 <br />She provided Council with a brief background history of the changes and updates to the City Hall 23 <br />building noting that there has been a lot of activity over the past 44-years. She stated that in 24 <br />March 2003 the Council approved a Physical Needs Assessment and held a work session in 25 <br />November of 2003. She stated that they toured the City Hall facility in May 2004 in the hopes 26 <br />that the City would approve and proceed with the Design Development phase beginning in 27 <br />October 2004. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Ms. Schultz stated that the Design Development had direction from Council to address as many 30 <br />items as possible to give a better idea of the costs. She stated that this was finished in February 31 <br />2005 and provided Council with a walkthrough of the needs including: poor environmental 32 <br />conditions; regulatory safety and security problems; worn-out and obsolete items. She provided 33 <br />Council with an overview of the environmental conditions found during the tour of the City Hall 34 <br />building. She stated that they should meet the HIPAA regulations and the generator upgrades for 35 <br />the EOC. She stated that there is a lack of building security; lack of storage space and the police 36 <br />area is inadequate. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Ms. Schultz explained that the proposed solutions include insulating walls; replacing ducts and 39 <br />windows; remove obsolete wiring; modernize the elevator and provide keyless security systems. 40 <br />She stated that the functional improvements would include relocating the Community 41 <br />Development Department and the Finance Department and utilize the basement for additional 42 <br />storage. She reviewed the proposed layouts for the Police, Finance, Community Development, 43 <br />Administrative Services and Public Works departments. She stated that the probable cost for 44 <br />construction, if it were all done in one phase, would be $3.6 million to replace with a new facility 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.