Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Item No: 8C <br />Meeting Date: May 23, 2005 <br />Type of Business: Consent <br />Administrator Review : ______ <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: Mounds View City Council <br />From: Kristin Prososki, Planning Associate <br />Item Title/Subject: Resolution 6539, Consideration of Application to Voluntary <br />Investigation and Cleanup Program (VIC) for City Property <br />Known as the Former Sysco Property <br /> <br /> <br />Introduction: <br /> <br />The City has been negotiating a potential sale of the Bridges of Mounds View Golf Course <br />with Medtronic, Inc. As part of the assessment of the site, Medtronic hired Conestoga- <br />Rovers and Associates (CRA) to conduct a Phase I and II environmental assessment. After <br />meeting with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to discuss the findings of the <br />environmental assessment, it was determined that the City had the option of making an <br />application to the Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup Program (VIC) to request a “No <br />Action” determination letter for the former Sysco property. <br /> <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br />During the environmental assessment, CRA found debris, such as pieces of concrete, bricks <br />and tires, located in a test pit on the former Sysco property. CRA also found slightly elevated <br />levels of arsenic and pentachlorophenol (PCP) on the golf course property. A meeting was <br />held with the MPCA, CRA, Medtronic and City Staff to discuss the findings of the <br />environmental assessment. During the meeting, the MPCA Staff stated that it is a, “pretty <br />clean site that you can develop” and recommended that Medtronic, as the potential <br />developer, apply to the VIC program for a “No Association” determination letter for the golf <br />course property and that the City apply for a “No Action” determination letter for the former <br />Sysco property. <br /> <br />The VIC program is completely voluntary and offers cities and developers technical <br />assistance with environmental issues related to redevelopment. According to the MPCA <br />website, “persons who are not otherwise responsible for a contamination problem may be <br />eligible for future liability protection when they voluntarily undertake an investigation and, if <br />necessary, cleanup action approved by the MPCA through the VIC Program”. Basically, this <br />means that if cities and developers were not originally responsible for the actions that led to <br />the contamination, they can be given protection from being held liable for the problem. <br /> <br />Medtronic did apply for and receive a “No Association” letter for the golf course property. <br />The City can apply for a “No Action” letter for the former Sysco property. As stated on the <br />MPCA website, “ A No Action letter states that based on the review of the submitted <br />documents…the MPCA Commissioner will refrain from taking specific administrative or <br />enforcement action”. <br /> <br />