My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2005/05/23
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Agenda Packets - 2005/05/23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:48:04 PM
Creation date
7/31/2018 1:22:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
5/23/2005
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
5/23/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
215
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />RLK Letter <br />May 19, 2005 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br /> <br />Minnesota Department of Transportation <br />Letter from Mary E. Jackson, Transportation Planner, dated May 16, 2005: <br /> <br />Traffic <br />Comment: <br />The general growth for this area is more than the freeway system can handle. Mn/DOT has <br />been working with the cities and counties involved determining future interchange <br />improvements needed for the County Road J and Lake Drive area, but even if funding is <br />obtained to reconstruct the interchange, the intersections may operate poorly if the freeway <br />is congested. It is recommended that the cities and counties develop options to improve <br />their roadway networks to provide mobility. For questions on all the above points, please <br />contact Nicole Rosen, Mn/DOT Metro District North Area Traffic Support Engineer, at (651) <br />634-2145. <br /> <br />Response: <br />Comment noted. As individual projects progress through the design development <br />stages of approval, local transportation requirements will be identified and addressed. <br /> <br />Comment: <br />On page 7, in the third paragraph, the second and third sentences are incorrect. The new <br />interchange at Lake Drive/County Road J on I-35W is indeed needed because of the <br />additional traffic volumes used resulting from the Bridges Office Development/ Medtronic <br />campus and other surrounding developments. There is no current access to the north at <br />County Road J and I-35W traffic. The next interchange to the north at I-35W and 95th <br />Avenue cannot handle the volumes that will be coming to this area. The traffic modeling <br />forecast shows that traffic is expected to back up 900 feet from the 95th Avenue <br />southbound exit ramp. This backup is due to the inadequate left turn on 95th Avenue for <br />motorists to go southbound on the West Service Road. Full movements are not allowed at <br />the West Service Road and 95th Avenue. On the previous page (page 6 of 37, fourth <br />bullet), the 2011 improvements call for a median to be placed on the West Service Road to <br />prevent southbound left-turn movements. Thus, motorists traveling southbound on the <br />Service Road will no longer be able to access southbound I-35W at County Road J (based <br />on the Medtronic Campus/Bridges Office Development Improvements). This diverts <br />motorists up to 95th and I-35W. If you have any questions about the above issues, please <br />contact Beth Neuendorf, Mn/DOT Metro District North Area Engineer, at 651-582-1579. <br /> <br />Response: <br />Comment noted. The preparer apologizes for the confusion. The intent of the comment <br />was to state that as conveyed to the stakeholders by SEH, MnDOT’s consultant, on April <br />21, 2005, with or without this change in land use, a new interchange should be provided at <br />Lake Street/ CR J. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.