Agenda Packets - 2005/06/13 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View City Council May 23, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 24 pond in 2000. He stated that he would like to know why the City did not receive the credits 1 and who is responsible for making sure this was taken care of. 2 • Staff plans to provide the City Council with an update and report on the 2005 Street Project 3 at the July 5, 2005 Council work session. He indicated that Staff has to go back to the 4 drawing board to rework the project noting that Staff is anticipating implementing this 5 project in 2007. 6 • County Road 10 redevelopment and revitalization plan – He asked of a status and whether the 7 surveying has been finished. He expressed concerns stating that he wants to keep this going. 8 o Director Ericson stated that all of the groundwork has been completed, all analysis is 9 done and they have looked at all of the existing street signals at the intersections. He 10 assured Council that they are moving forward. 11 o City Administrator Ulrich stated that he would provide Council with an update noting 12 that the City needs to pursue the safety and improvements of Highway 10. 13 • Spring Creek Regional Quality Pond – at the present time, the two property owners affected 14 were not originally willing but are willing now. He stated that they have voiced their 15 intentions stating that if the City did not act they would be installing new drives and 16 landscaping. He stated that this should be looked into to get it moving forward. He noted 17 that this was also contingent on the street project from last year with respect to controlling 18 some of the water in that area. 19 o City Administrator Ulrich indicated that the last time this was discussed they talked about 20 sending out status notices on the project. He stated that he spoke with Public Works 21 Director Lee and he highly recommends sending out a final notice to provide a status of 22 the project. He stated that he would like to send out the final letter with the update. 23 24 Council Member Stigney stated that the petition stopped the pond and asked what it is that they 25 plan to send out. 26 27 City Administrator Ulrich stated that this was on the petition but that it did not apply to the 28 project as the petition was sufficient. 29 30 City Attorney Riggs explained that the petition was for the assessment of the project and that is 31 the authority in the Charter to utilize this process. 32 33 Mayor Marty asked City Administrator Ulrich to review the issues he has outlined with Public 34 Works Director Lee and provide the Council with an update. 35 36 Brian Amundsen stated that he was also included in the meeting on the Street Project. He stated 37 that part of the issue Council is still facing is on the financing. He stated that in the meeting they 38 discussed ways to engage other groups in order to come up with a better solution. He stated that 39 he would like to remind people that the Spring Creek project still has to go through the 60-day 40 public comment period. He noted that they had 97 signatures of people that do not want to see 41 the wetland disturbed in order to install a holding pond. He stated that if Council is still 42 considering moving forward with the sediment pond they would still have a very angry 43 neighborhood. 44 45