My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2005/07/11
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Agenda Packets - 2005/07/11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:48:56 PM
Creation date
7/31/2018 1:33:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
7/11/2005
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
7/11/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
283
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council June 13, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 13 <br /> <br />one of the issues discussed was the potential traffic increase on Louise and Clearview. He stated 1 <br />that there would be approximately 30 of the townhomes that would take direct access to 2 <br />Clearview and Louise and it was asked if it would be possible for the two driveways or a single 3 <br />combined driveway to be relocated onto Long Lake Road or alternatively to County Road H2. 4 <br />He stated that it is a possibility from an engineering standpoint but they need to take a look to 5 <br />determine if it is feasible. He stated that the next day they contacted Bonestroo, Rosene, 6 <br />Anderlik and Associates to ask them to give us an idea of what it would cost to look at whether 7 <br />or not the driveways could be rerouted. He stated that there are a number of things that would 8 <br />have to be looked at including wetlands, storm water management and poor soil so there would 9 <br />have to be extensive research done to find out if it would be possible. He stated that the initial 10 <br />estimate was about $12,500 to do the work. He stated that he has provided an updated memo on 11 <br />the project noting that the ballpark estimate for the work would be in a range from $11,500 to 12 <br />$70,500. He stated that there is a resolution here that staff does support looking at this from a 13 <br />community perspective. He stated that staff feels strongly that if there is a way to reroute these 14 <br />driveways to Long Lake Road, a more appropriate location that it would be worthwhile to pursue. 15 <br />He indicated that Mr. Hart is not opposed to the City looking at this as an option. He stated that 16 <br />the resolution would authorize Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates to do the feasibility 17 <br />at a cost not to exceed $17,500.00. He stated it could come in less noting that it likely that soil 18 <br />borings would be required. 19 <br /> 20 <br />Council Member Gunn clarified that if they do get the approval to go off Long Lake Road then 21 <br />Greenwood be closed. Community Development Director Ericson confirmed that Greenwood 22 <br />would be closed. 23 <br /> 24 <br />Council Member Gunn asked if they would be able to use the soil borings that Mr. Hart recently 25 <br />took. 26 <br /> 27 <br />Community Development Director Ericson stated that they can and plan to utilize the current 28 <br />boring samples noting that they would also have to take boring samples from specific areas 29 <br />where the driveway would be routed. He stated that there is a significant variation between the 30 <br />borings that were taken and they need to get a really good sense of what is underneath because 31 <br />they don’t want the driveway to sink. 32 <br /> 33 <br />Council Member Gunn asked why the City is paying for it and not Mr. Harstad. She asked if the 34 <br />City could bill him. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Community Development Director Ericson stated that the City could bill him noting that he 37 <br />would not pay it. He explained that this is something that is the responsibility of the City. He 38 <br />stated that Mr. Harstad has an approved plan that shows the driveways accessing Greenwood 39 <br />Drive going out Louis and Clearview and he is not obligated to reroute the drives on his own. 40 <br /> 41 <br />Council Member Gunn asked if they have the results back on his soil borings and are they okay. 42 <br /> 43 <br />Community Development Director Ericson confirmed that they do have the results and explained 44 <br />that the Rice Creek Watershed District is going to make that determination as to the drainage and 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.