Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> ITEM #9 <br /> • <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> MEMO <br /> To: Mounds View Planning Commission <br /> From: Pamela Sheldon, Community Development Director ; <br /> Subject: Request for Ordinance Revision <br /> Re: Parking Lot Setbacks <br /> Date: August 21, 1996 <br /> Mr. Dan Moon, 6929 Pleasant View Drive, has submitted a letter requesting that the Zoning <br /> Code be amended to require a fifteen foot setback for parking lots from property lines where a <br /> church proposal abuts residential uses. It is staff's understanding that this request was prompted <br /> by his concern about the parking lot proposed for the New Apostolic Church at 3025 County <br /> Road H. Mr. Moon's property is directly north of the proposed church site. The current <br /> ordinance requirement is five feet regardless of the type of development or the adjacent uses. <br /> • Any person owning real estate within the City is allowed to initiate a request to amend the Zoning <br /> Code (Section 1125.01 Subd. 2). <br /> A change in the setback requirement for parking lots would affect the site plan for the New <br /> Apostolic Church. Given the current placement and shape of the building, and the requirement <br /> for 35 foot setbacks from streets, it appears that achieving a fifteen foot setback would be <br /> difficult. Staff has not had an opportunity to study in detail how such a setback could be <br /> achieved, but our initial response is that it could require moving the parking so it is between the <br /> building and County Road H. It may not be possible to meet this setback requirement without <br /> reducing the size of the building, or changing its shape. <br /> Staff has consulted with the City Attorney's office as to whether a request for an ordinance <br /> change, if passed, could be applied to an application which has been submitted and is under <br /> review. Jim Thompson, who is acting as City Attorney while Bob Long is on vacation, has <br /> explained that an ordinance amendment could be applied, if the City Council elected to put in <br /> place a moratorium and then passed the ordinance amendment prior to considering the <br /> application. <br /> If the Planning Commission wishes to pursue this idea, the Commission would need to forward a <br /> recommendation to City Council that a moratorium be declared on the development of <br /> nonresidential uses subject to a conditional use permit in residential zone districts, other than <br /> • model homes and accessory buildings and structures, in order to consider an ordinance <br /> amendment regarding parking lot setbacks between such uses and residential uses. A resolution <br />