My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-21-1996
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
08-21-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2018 3:20:16 PM
Creation date
7/31/2018 1:54:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/21/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br /> ITEM #9 <br /> • <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> MEMO <br /> To: Mounds View Planning Commission <br /> From: Pamela Sheldon, Community Development Director ; <br /> Subject: Request for Ordinance Revision <br /> Re: Parking Lot Setbacks <br /> Date: August 21, 1996 <br /> Mr. Dan Moon, 6929 Pleasant View Drive, has submitted a letter requesting that the Zoning <br /> Code be amended to require a fifteen foot setback for parking lots from property lines where a <br /> church proposal abuts residential uses. It is staff's understanding that this request was prompted <br /> by his concern about the parking lot proposed for the New Apostolic Church at 3025 County <br /> Road H. Mr. Moon's property is directly north of the proposed church site. The current <br /> ordinance requirement is five feet regardless of the type of development or the adjacent uses. <br /> • Any person owning real estate within the City is allowed to initiate a request to amend the Zoning <br /> Code (Section 1125.01 Subd. 2). <br /> A change in the setback requirement for parking lots would affect the site plan for the New <br /> Apostolic Church. Given the current placement and shape of the building, and the requirement <br /> for 35 foot setbacks from streets, it appears that achieving a fifteen foot setback would be <br /> difficult. Staff has not had an opportunity to study in detail how such a setback could be <br /> achieved, but our initial response is that it could require moving the parking so it is between the <br /> building and County Road H. It may not be possible to meet this setback requirement without <br /> reducing the size of the building, or changing its shape. <br /> Staff has consulted with the City Attorney's office as to whether a request for an ordinance <br /> change, if passed, could be applied to an application which has been submitted and is under <br /> review. Jim Thompson, who is acting as City Attorney while Bob Long is on vacation, has <br /> explained that an ordinance amendment could be applied, if the City Council elected to put in <br /> place a moratorium and then passed the ordinance amendment prior to considering the <br /> application. <br /> If the Planning Commission wishes to pursue this idea, the Commission would need to forward a <br /> recommendation to City Council that a moratorium be declared on the development of <br /> nonresidential uses subject to a conditional use permit in residential zone districts, other than <br /> • model homes and accessory buildings and structures, in order to consider an ordinance <br /> amendment regarding parking lot setbacks between such uses and residential uses. A resolution <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.