My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-04-1996
MoundsView
>
City Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
09-04-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2018 3:20:53 PM
Creation date
7/31/2018 2:08:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/4/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
147
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> Mounds View Planning Commission August 7, 1996 <br /> • Regular Meeting Page 15 <br /> when the applicant wants occupancy of the <br /> building, the items are not completed, the City <br /> would decide if it would allow security to be <br /> posted and occupancy permits to be issued, or <br /> require that the improvements be completed. <br /> Right now the City requires that the applicant <br /> put up security before construction is started, <br /> when the usual practice is to construct private <br /> improvements along with construction of the <br /> building. There are occasions when <br /> improvements such as landscaping cannot be <br /> completed until the next growing season <br /> because of weather. In these situations, <br /> security could be required for installation of the <br /> landscaping and an occupancy permit issued. <br /> For public improvements such as sidewalks, <br /> curb and gutter, streets, etc., development <br /> contracts and security are needed and no <br /> • <br /> change is proposed in this requirement. She <br /> expressed that development contracts are not <br /> needed for proposals such as oversized <br /> garages. Resolution No. 470-96 talks about <br /> making these minor items exempt because no <br /> other improvements are involved. It was <br /> requested by the Planning Commission that <br /> Resolution No. 470-96 be amended to state <br /> that the Planning Commission recommend and <br /> the City Council grant waivers when such <br /> contracts are not needed to fulfill the <br /> requirements of the ordinance, rather than <br /> exempt certain situations. The Planning <br /> •Commission discussed that there are some <br /> cases when the construction of an oversized <br /> garage involves removal of other structures and <br /> then a development contract and security is <br /> needed. <br /> Motion/Second: Miller/Brasaemle to table the <br /> consideration of Resolution No. 470-96 <br /> • regarding Ordinance No. 588 amending the <br /> development contract language of chapter <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.