Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission August 7, 1996 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 14 • <br /> Community Development Director Sheldon <br /> indicated that we will need to review new plans <br /> to determine what the variance request is. <br /> Chair Peterson and Commissioner Brasaemle • <br /> expressed their concerns that this proposal did <br /> not meet the criteria for granting a variance. <br /> The applicant indicated that they are seeking a <br /> variance in order to add green space but that <br /> locating the building on the site is workable <br /> without a variance. <br /> Motion/Second: Brasaemle/Brooks to table this <br /> item with no action to be taken before their <br /> September 4, 1996, meeting. <br /> 5 ayes 0 nays <br /> Motion Carried <br /> Commissioner Brasaemle informed the • <br /> residents of the next Planning Commission <br /> meeting dates of Wednesday, August 21 and <br /> the regular meeting to be held on September 4, <br /> 1996. <br /> Planning Associate Pruitt informed the <br /> Commission that she would be writing the <br /> applicant a letter requesting an additional 60 <br /> days in order to process the application. <br /> Community Development Director Sheldon 7. Consideration of <br /> reviewed this item indicating that the Mounds Resolution No. <br /> View ordinance requires development contracts 470-96 Regarding <br /> for almost every step in the development Ordinance No. 588 <br /> process, whether the step involves (Chapter 1006.06) <br /> improvements or not. It is staffs understanding <br /> that the purpose of the requirement is to make <br /> sure improvements are completed. She <br /> recommended that, for private improvements, a <br /> better approach would be to allow applicants to <br /> proceed without posting security. If, at the time • <br />